Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Why is a different TTL resturned for bare and FQDN queries?

Sorry for lack of reply to this, I hope you're still there, Wojtek. I think this may have something to do with your other post about authoritative mode - one of the answers has the "aa" flag set, and the other one doesn't. It would be useful, for both of the situations you describe, to set

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Use dnsmasq to assign static /32 addresses via DHCP

Am 15.03.19 um 16:02 schrieb Simon Kelley: > On 15/03/2019 12:44, Peter Lieven wrote: >> Hi Simon, >> >> Am 14.03.19 um 18:41 schrieb Simon Kelley: >>> Is this a use for something like the ISC dhcpd shared-network configuration. >>> >>> >>> In the dnsmasq case, we could have something like >>> >>>

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Use dnsmasq to assign static /32 addresses via DHCP

On 15/03/2019 12:44, Peter Lieven wrote: > Hi Simon, > > Am 14.03.19 um 18:41 schrieb Simon Kelley: >> Is this a use for something like the ISC dhcpd shared-network configuration. >> >> >> In the dnsmasq case, we could have something like >> >> shared-network=, >> >> or >> >> shared-network=, >>

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Use dnsmasq to assign static /32 addresses via DHCP

Hi Simon, Am 14.03.19 um 18:41 schrieb Simon Kelley: > Is this a use for something like the ISC dhcpd shared-network configuration. > > > In the dnsmasq case, we could have something like > > shared-network=, > > or > > shared-network=, > > In the first case dnsmasq would behave _as_if_ the