Hey all,
I support Petr's idea of putting the responsibility for upstream
retires into dnsmasq's hands. All of his points seem very valid.
I also agree about the necessity of a lower limit to prevent users from
configuring dnsmasq for retrying every, say, 5 msec (unless they really
want it and
Hi wkitty42,
thanks for the reply.
This punycode indeed is a good startr.
I found a website that converts punycode to plain text and apparently only one of five domains seems to be punycode.
Please don't click them, they are considered to be malicious:
address=/00.00.1596.hk/
