Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] dnsmasq-2.46 release candidate.

2008-10-21 Thread Matthias Andree
Simon Kelley si...@thekelleys.org.uk writes: Update example config dhcp option 47, the previous suggestion generated and illegal, zero-length, option. Thanks to Matthias Andree for finding this. I haven't looked at your release candidate (code docs) yet.

[Dnsmasq-discuss] Can't serve more than 1 local domain

2008-10-21 Thread Holger Schletz
Hi, I'm using dnsmasq 2.35 on Debian to serve a local domain. This has worked for a long time without problems. Now I want to serve a second domain as an alias for the old domain. I use this option: local=/olddomain/newdomain/ After restarting dnsmasq, the logfile says, as expexted: using

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Can't serve more than 1 local domain

2008-10-21 Thread Rune Kock
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 13:36, Holger Schletz schl...@zfg-dortmund.de wrote: Hi, I'm using dnsmasq 2.35 on Debian to serve a local domain. This has worked for a long time without problems. Now I want to serve a second domain as an alias for the old domain. I use this option: Just to clarify.

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Can't serve more than 1 local domain

2008-10-21 Thread Simon Kelley
Holger Schletz wrote: Hi, I'm using dnsmasq 2.35 on Debian to serve a local domain. This has worked for a long time without problems. Now I want to serve a second domain as an alias for the old domain. I use this option: local=/olddomain/newdomain/ After restarting dnsmasq, the logfile

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Can't serve more than 1 local domain

2008-10-21 Thread Holger Schletz
Hi, That didn't change anything. Old domain and hostnames without domain part still work (either from /etc/hosts or DHCP-assigned), but new domain doesn't. How does dnsmasq know which domains it should serve, if the local option is not for this purpose? Simon Kelley schrieb: Holger

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] dnsmasq-2.46 release candidate.

2008-10-21 Thread Matthias Andree
On Tue, 21 Oct 2008, Simon Kelley wrote: Matthias Andree wrote: Simon Kelley si...@thekelleys.org.uk writes: Update example config dhcp option 47, the previous suggestion generated and illegal, zero-length, option. Thanks to Matthias Andree for finding

[Dnsmasq-discuss] RFC: Split up the default configuration file

2008-10-21 Thread Rune Kock
I find that dnsmasq's configuration file can be somewhat intimidating for newbies. There are quite a lot of options, but only a few of them are really needed for a typical newbie-setup. What about splitting the current dnsmasq.conf into 5 files: - dnsmasq.conf itself is primarily used to

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] RFC: Split up the default configuration file

2008-10-21 Thread RevRagnarok
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 1:53 PM, Rune Kock rune.k...@gmail.com wrote: I find that dnsmasq's configuration file can be somewhat intimidating for newbies. There are quite a lot of options, but only a few of them are really needed for a typical newbie-setup. What about splitting the current