> The facility is there already:
>
> "IPv6 addresses may contain only the host-identifier part:
> --dhcp-host=laptop,[::56] in which case they act as wildcards constructed
> dhcp ranges, with the appropriate network part inserted."
Hi Simon!
It seems, I've overlooked that ;)
That's what I need
On 28/04/14 22:17, Conrad Kostecki wrote:
> Hi! Recently, I was using an IPv6 tunnel from Hurricane Electric with
> a static /48 IPv6-subnet, which was working fine. My ISP (Telekom
> Deutschland) offers now native IPV6, but its only giving me a dynamic
> /56 IPv6-subnet. I have to use the IPv6-con
Hi!
Recently, I was using an IPv6 tunnel from Hurricane Electric with a static /48
IPv6-subnet, which was working fine.
My ISP (Telekom Deutschland) offers now native IPV6, but its only giving me a
dynamic /56 IPv6-subnet. I have to use the IPv6-constructors with DNSMasq. That
is working fine fo
> "DT" == Dave Taht writes:
DT> As one example of a registrar not with the program, name.com
DT> (registrar for bufferbloat.net) does not allow for ds records to
DT> come from it, so that domain can't be fully signed.
DT> So it sounds to me as if negative proofs are not possible with
DT> reg
This timeout, I'm guessing this is older/naive setups that aren't expecting
to support DNSSEC, and thought "over-securing" their setup, have managed to
break the non-existence-proof process?
-Aaron
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 9:32 PM, Simon Kelley wrote:
...
> Neither of authoritative nameservers f
On 28/04/14 19:56, Dave Taht wrote:
> I see A and requests for for "ds.test-ipv6.com" that fail.
>
The root of this failure is that DS ds.test-ipv6.com is broken.
<<>> DiG 9.8.1-P1 <<>> @8.8.8.8 ds ds.test-ipv6.com
; (1 server found)
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- o
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 11:49 AM, Simon Kelley wrote:
> On 25/04/14 19:01, Jim Gettys wrote:
>> More specifically, after boot, most of the time test-ipv6.com reports lots
>> of problems.
>>
>> Then I turned off both dnssec and dnssec-check-unsigned, and restarted
>> dnsmasq; clean bill of health f
I see A and requests for for "ds.test-ipv6.com" that fail.
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 11:37 AM, Dave Taht wrote:
> I have put a link up to two of jim's captures going to test-ipv6 via cero,
> one with dnssec enabled, captured at the local laptop
>
> http://snapon.lab.bufferbloat.net/~cero2/ba
I have put a link up to two of jim's captures going to test-ipv6 via cero,
one with dnssec enabled, captured at the local laptop
http://snapon.lab.bufferbloat.net/~cero2/baddns/
definately a lot of missing responses when captured at this end. the local
laptop is using a local dnsmasq forwarder.
Note that this bug appears to be a hard lockup.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/1313393
investigations are continuing.
Simon.
On 28/04/14 12:18, Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant wrote:
> On 25/04/2014 09:37, David Joslin wrote:
>> Hi Kevin and thanks for the help.
>>
> Apo
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 9:55 AM, Jim Gettys wrote:
> Comcast recently lit up IPv6 native dual stack in the Boston area.
>
> The http://test-ipv6.com/ web site complains about DNS problems unless
> dnssec is disabled; if it is, I get various timeouts.
>
>
>
Test with IPv4 DNS record
> ok (4.196
Comcast recently lit up IPv6 native dual stack in the Boston area.
The http://test-ipv6.com/ web site complains about DNS problems unless
dnssec is disabled; if it is, I get various timeouts.
Test with IPv4 DNS record
ok (4.196s)
Test with IPv6 DNS record
ok (0.115s) using ipv6
Test with Dual S
On 25/04/2014 09:37, David Joslin wrote:
> Hi Kevin and thanks for the help.
>
Apologies for delay in reply.
> Is it possible to upgrade the dnsmasq version on the router without
> waiting for the author of the tomato firmware to include a later
> version in a release of his firmware (and you menti
13 matches
Mail list logo
