Thanks Geert.
> -Original Message-
> From: Dnsmasq-discuss
> On Behalf Of Geert Stappers via Dnsmasq-discuss
> Sent: Monday, April 5, 2021 3:55 AM
> To: dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
> Subject: Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Log DNS Queries/Responses based on IP
> Address
>
> On Mon,
On 05/04/2021 21:30, Dominik Derigs wrote:
> To be even more precise:
>
> On Mon, 2021-04-05 at 22:16 +0200, Dominik Derigs wrote:
>> This is the issue I'm concerned about. Some clients send the same
>> query
>> multiple times (they don't seem to have a local cache).
>
> These clients don't even
On 05/04/2021 21:16, Dominik Derigs wrote:
> Hey Simon,
>
> On Mon, 2021-04-05 at 20:38 +0100, Simon Kelley wrote:
>> Post 2.83, a the second query would be combined with the first, which
>> can only reduce upstream traffic. The change in 2.85 is that the second
>> query triggers a retry, so
To be even more precise:
On Mon, 2021-04-05 at 22:16 +0200, Dominik Derigs wrote:
> This is the issue I'm concerned about. Some clients send the same
> query
> multiple times (they don't seem to have a local cache).
These clients don't even intend them as retries. Wireshark confirms
they send
From: Geert Stappers
Removed empty lines from end of src/*.[ch] files.
If the new last line became '#endif'
was the condition of the '#if' added.
---
src/arp.c| 2 --
src/auth.c | 3 ---
src/blockdata.c | 1 -
src/bpf.c| 2 --
src/cache.c | 2 --
Hey Simon,
On Mon, 2021-04-05 at 20:38 +0100, Simon Kelley wrote:
> Post 2.83, a the second query would be combined with the first, which
> can only reduce upstream traffic. The change in 2.85 is that the second
> query triggers a retry, so closer to the original situation. BUT the
> retry is
On 05/04/2021 20:38, Simon Kelley wrote:
> I'll put up a patch in the next hour or so. Dominik, please could you
> see if it improves the upstream traffic rate? If I've misunderstood or
> mis-analysed this, I'll certainly look at you approach.
>
Patch there now:
On 05/04/2021 16:46, Dominik Derigs wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I've seeing a notable increase in upstream traffic with the current
> dnsmasq release candidate. Some investigations have revealed that the
> reason for this is the modified forwarding philosophy that *always*
> triggers a retry
>
> Hey Simon,
>
> On Thu, 2021-04-01 at 23:55 +0100, Simon Kelley wrote:
> > I could do with a handle on exactly how people are configuring dnsmasq
> > to do ad blocking. It's not something I have much experience of.
>
> The situation for Pi-hole (a popular ad blocker based on dnsmasq) is the
>
Hey all,
I've seeing a notable increase in upstream traffic with the current
dnsmasq release candidate. Some investigations have revealed that the
reason for this is the modified forwarding philosophy that *always*
triggers a retry whenever a query is received before the upstream was
able to
Hi,
"How To Ask Questions The Smart Way" has immediatly after the introduction
an advice on before you ask.
http://www.catb.org/esr/faqs/smart-questions.html#before
Following that advice is still no guarantee for a quick response.
So when you are still stuck with something that you think
On Mon, Apr 05, 2021 at 09:47:38AM +0200, Yes wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 09:02:02PM +, Donald Muller wrote:
> > I looked at the man pages but didn't see anything for this (maybe
> > I missed it). Is there a way to specify DNS logging based on an IP
> > address? In other word I just want
On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 09:02:02PM +, Donald Muller wrote:
> I looked at the man pages but didn't see anything for this (maybe
> I missed it). Is there a way to specify DNS logging based on an IP
> address? In other word I just want to log DNS queries and responses
> from/to a particular IP
13 matches
Mail list logo
