>
> Ok, pulling back a level or two in the discussion tree since I'd
> gonethe wrong path, I have now tried the following:
>
> dhcp-range=,...
> dhcp-range=tag:,,...
> dhcp-host=,,,
> dhcp-host=,,,
>
> I deleted the dnsmasq lease file in /var, ran dnsmasq -d, and from the
> host with given eth (or
On 26 June 2014 12:45, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> Bonjour David,
>
> >
> > Here's the configuration for the DHCP range used on one VLAN (on
> interface
> > br1).
> > interface=br1
> > dhcp-range=tag:br1,10.10.20.101,10.10.20.200,255.255.255.0,1440m
> > dhcp-option=tag:br1,3,10.10.20.1
> >
>
On 25 June 2014 06:24, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> Le Tue, 24 Jun 2014 23:50:54 +0100, David Joslin a
> écrit :
>
> > Thanks for the reply, Simon.
> >
> > How would I do that?
> >
> > I already use the --dhcp-host option to allocate IP add
=tag:br3,10.10.70.101,10.10.70.200,255.255.255.0,1440m.
This works fine. But I can't see how to allocate static IP addresses based
on VLAN membership.
Am I missing something obvious?
Cheers
David
On 24 June 2014 22:30, Simon Kelley wrote:
> On 24/06/14 10:08, David Joslin wrote:
> > I have a wireless netw
I have a wireless network split into several vlans, each with its own
subnet, with dnsmasq serving all vlans. The wireless network is a Ubiquti
Unifi system and the access points all have static IP addresses on the
management vlan. Additionally, the access points each request IP addresses
via DHCP
2014 18:36, Simon Kelley wrote:
> Note that this bug appears to be a hard lockup.
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/1313393
>
> investigations are continuing.
>
>
> Simon.
>
>
>
>
> On 28/04/14 12:18, Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant w
or your comments on the above.
Cheers
David
On 24 April 2014 21:13, Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant <
ke...@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk> wrote:
> On 24/04/2014 20:49, Simon Kelley wrote:
> > On 24/04/14 20:41, David Joslin wrote:
> >> Thanks for the reply, Simon.
> >>
> &g
Also, would the problem not show itself as soon as
dnsmasq was restarted rather than showing the gradual increase in peak
usage until it hits 100%?
I hope this helps. Any thoughts on this pattern?
Cheers
David
On 24 April 2014 12:41, Simon Kelley wrote:
> On 22/04/14 20:04, David Joslin wrote
The router isn't being used for wi-fi. We have a Ubiquiti Unifi wi-fi
system throughout the building. The router is just routing (and providing
dns, dhcp etc).
David
On 23 April 2014 02:43, Weedy wrote:
>
> On 22 Apr 2014 15:10, "David Joslin" wrote:
> >
> >
Hi
I have an Asus rt-n16 router running the Shibby version of the Tomato
firmware which includes dnsmasq version 2.69test3. It's in use in a
building that frequently has 50+ users on a wireless network and dnsmasq
has performed extremely well with very little load on the router.
However, we've re
Thanks, Simon.
The access points are all on vlan 9 (the management vlan). They serve
wireless clients on vlans 3, 4 and 5 but they don't have interfaces on
these vlans.
What's really baffling me is that nothing has changed with the network
configuration. I've been through the configuration of the
I have dnsmasq (version 2.69test8-78-g6e0290a) on a router running the
tomato firmware (and I hope it's OK to post questions about such a router
here). My network is split into several vlans, each with its own subnet,
and one of the vlans has several wi-fi access points which obtain their IP
addres
12 matches
Mail list logo
