onfiguration makes sense. The only point is why dnsmasq is not
> > > abandoning the previous lease if the man page says it would do it.
> >
> > IIRC was on the mailinglist in the last six months a "works for me" report
> > about switching from ethe
ts a device name. Either factory default like
"Android-d0-4d-e3" or end user tuned like "Bobs Collar".
> Thanks!
Make another visit the mailinglist archive. Find back again
the two MAC address posting (and share this time the link with us)
IIRC is it a simular situation (
t; both cases.
>
> Am I doing something wrong? Any idea how to fix this?
Changing the Access Point configuration???
Changing the Access Points???
> Thanks in advance.
Please keep us, this mailinglist (archive), posted.
Groeten
Geert Stappers
--
Silence is hard to parse
_
think some pieces of the puzzle are missing.
> And this is my only point. I am not arguing if tp-link one-mesh
> access-points are doing well by changing the client mac-address, nor if I
> am being smart or stupid using wildcards to identify dhcp-clients, nor if
>
ected to that AP.
I don't understand that . I think it tries to explain "available IPv4
address in best fit dhcp-range".
>6. dnsmasq, despite having identified the client,
And how did that identification happen???
>
an option to ignore
> errors.
Hi bellocarico,
Does `dnsmasq --test` reveal the configuration error you encountered?
Groeten
Geert Stappers
@Edward: Thanks for replying below previous text.
--
Silence is hard to parse
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing
EAD#l13
*
https://thekelleys.org.uk/gitweb/?p=dnsmasq.git;a=blob;f=contrib/systemd/dnsmasq.service;h=ff0ed089b2062258fbeccc48d5b7becc05670557;hb=HEAD#l10
Groeten
Geert Stappers
--
Silence is hard to parse
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
From: treysis
Intented for IPv6 only installations
that have to deal with software that prefers IPv4 above IPv6.
---
src/dnsmasq.h | 3 ++-
src/option.c | 3 +++
src/rfc1035.c | 11 +++
3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/dnsmasq.h b/src/dnsmasq.h
index
reworked version here soon.
Hopefully is Author left intact. (I'm about to `git send-email` a patch
that is not mine ).
And the original patch lacks update of the manual page,
it is where I chip in.
Cheers
Geert Stappers
P.S.
https://git-send-email.io/ for instructions on email patches.
See "Linux kernel
On Sat, Jun 05, 2021 at 05:37:25PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 05, 2021 at 03:34:59PM +0200, Trey Sis wrote:
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Treysis
> >
> > Patch:
> >
> > >From bd22a36f76e35a0dc6c8be8996056318fec96e5e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
The manual page is now aware of option
filter out A records.
---
man/dnsmasq.8 | 4
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/man/dnsmasq.8 b/man/dnsmasq.8
index 59b6709..1ff48e9 100644
--- a/man/dnsmasq.8
+++ b/man/dnsmasq.8
@@ -347,6 +347,10 @@ the public DNS and can cause problems by
t;,
> mess->message);
>
>return ret;
> }
It feels wrong to **hide** valid TFTP requests under DEBUG logging.
Groeten
Geert Stappers
--
Silence is hard to parse
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
> my freeradus dhcp server configuration:
>
> server dhcp {
> listen {
> type = dhcp
> ipaddr = 10.10.254.1
> src_ipaddr = 10.10.254.1
> port = 67
> broadcast = no
>performance {
>skip_duplicate_ch
ocal/127.0.0.53
>
> Because systemd-resolved talks DNS even to names on different protocol,
> it might be able to resolve. I would consider it a wrong hack. Instead,
> try to offer some domain fr
cribed by option:66
Come again, because I do see
> dnsmasq-dhcp: 3891074361 next server: 10.10.253.1
> dnsmasq-dhcp: 3891074361 sent size: 12 option: 66 tftp-server 10.10.254.1
> Is 'next-server' different from dhcp-option-66?
Yes, they are two different "fields&
gt; freeradius's nonsense packets.
At https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2021q2/015184.html
is the message that reports "success" with isc-dhcp-relay.
Currently there is no information if the swap of "dhcp relay" was the
only change. T
On Sat, Jun 26, 2021 at 02:58:16PM +0700, Bino Oetomo wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 26, 2021 at 1:24 PM Geert Stappers wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 26, 2021 at 09:55:01AM +0700, Bino Oetomo wrote:
> > > Dear All.
> >
> > > Is 'next-server' different from dhcp-option-66?
&g
On Sat, Jun 26, 2021 at 11:52:10AM +0700, Bino Oetomo wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 26, 2021 at 4:12 AM Geert Stappers wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 11:30:18AM +0700, Bino Oetomo wrote:
> > > but how to know if dnsmasq is receiving that response?
> >
> > ...
o "Voctomix PC"
> The script uses a hostname, the hostname is set in /etc/hosts
>
> If there is a network with dhcp, then it will be nice to get the gateway
> and be able to ssh into machines.
I recommend to add an OpenWRT device or another portable DHCP server + DNServ
On Sun, Jun 27, 2021 at 03:06:14PM +0700, Bino Oetomo wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 27, 2021 at 12:03 AM Geert Stappers wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 26, 2021 at 02:58:16PM +0700, Bino Oetomo wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jun 26, 2021 at 1:24 PM Geert Stappers wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Jun 26,
work with others, I can find common ground"
Back to "computer network level".
Have access to the host network configuration at all time.
Yes, that has a price.
Groeten
Geert Stappers
--
Silence is hard to parse
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
P server not a client,
> so I’m unsure what the role of dnsmasq would be here.
Dnsmasq has a mailinglist.
Behind a mailinglist are people.
People have knowledge and experience.
People do tend to exchange knowledge and experience.
Possible exchange place is a mailinglist.
> Most of
On Fri, Jul 09, 2021 at 02:35:29PM +0200, Petr Menšík wrote:
> On 6/16/21 1:26 PM, Trey Sis wrote:
> > On 6/14/2021 1:43, Trey Sis wrote:
> >> On 6/13/2021 22:01, Geert Stappers wrote:
> >>> warning: 1 line adds whitespace errors.
> >>
> >
e something like
} } } dhcp-range=203.0.113.0, 203.0.113.7,255.255.255.248, 1d
Back to
> > From (1):
> >
> > " this dhcp-range MUST include the netmask."
> >
> > Unless I'm missing something, I don't see a subnet mask being specified.
> >
> &g
essage);
+ if ((option_bool(OPT_QUIET_TFTP) && err != ERR_FNF) ||
!option_bool(OPT_QUIET_TFTP))
+my_syslog(MS_TFTP | LOG_ERR, "%s", mess->message);
return ret;
}
Which text should go in the manual page?
Groeten
Geert Stappers
--
Silence is hard to parse
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
rver configuration file with us.
In the mailinglist archive (
https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2021q2/015180.html)
is currently only the incomplete (and "broken") configuration.
It is a good thing to give the mailing archive a working version.
The complete version shows where to insert the extra settings
and which syntax.
> So Nicolas Cavallari, I really appreciate your help.
Yes, compliments to Nicolas for diagnosing the problem.
> Sincerely
> -bino-
Please make reading in the discussion order possible,
reply below previous text.
Groeten
Geert Stappers
--
Silence is hard to parse
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
that (from a distance) in other projects.
So yes, refactoring makes sense.
Groeten
Geert Stappers
--
Silence is hard to parse
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
MAC-addresses. And than have a MAC address configured that none of the
clients has. No, I never have travelled that path. I do like to known
if it lead to the wanted goal.
Groeten
Geert Stappers
--
Silence is hard to parse
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing li
On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 06:07:27PM +, dnsmasqlist2...@rscubed.com wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Mar 2021, Geert Stappers via Dnsmasq-discuss wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 03:19:00AM +, dnsmasqlist2...@rscubed.com wrote:
> > >
> > > I am trying to do some CNAME filt
server_send(last_server, last_server->tcpfd,
packet, size + sizeof(u16), MSG_FASTOPEN);
if (errno == 0)
data_sent = 1;
> Go on and fix, thanks!
You are missing the opportunity
for contributing a patch to
e
in the dnsmasq configuration.
> thanks
I'm looking forward to the feedback.
> *Roland *
Groeten
Geert Stappers
--
Silence is hard to parse
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
From: Geert Stappers
Removed empty lines from end of src/*.[ch] files.
If the new last line became '#endif'
was the condition of the '#if' added.
---
src/arp.c| 2 --
src/auth.c | 3 ---
src/blockdata.c | 1 -
src/bpf.c| 2 --
src/cache.c | 2
On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 08:45:17PM -0600, Brian Hartvigsen wrote:
> This is based on the information at
> https://docs.umbrella.com/umbrella-api/docs/identifying-dns-traffic and
> https://docs.umbrella.com/umbrella-api/docs/identifying-dns-traffic2 . Using
> --umbrella by itself will enable
ther word I just want to log DNS queries and responses
> > from/to a particular IP address. Is this possible?
>
> Yes
Adding such **condiontal** logging to dnsmasq should be avoided.
Run dnsmasq with --log-queries=extra and filter from the output
the wanted information.
Groeten
G
168.17.0/24
Put the "static hosts" in one half
and assign the other half to the DHCP range.
> Seems simple but cannot figure how to set that up so would appreciate
> any pointers as to how I can do that.
Groeten
Geert Stappers
--
Silence is hard to parse
__
ate
> > any pointers as to how I can do that.
> >
> >
>
> Just specify the MAC address and the hostname and no IP address and it
> will do exactly what you want.
>
> dhcp-host=11:22:33:44:55:66,myhost
>
Yes,
if the DHCP client does sent its hostname.
Gr
On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 08:35:44PM +0100, Steffen Nurpmeso:
> Geert Stappers wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 14, 2021 at 01:39:18AM +0100, Steffen Nurpmeso
> > > For being more automatic and flexible with (many) VMs i changed
> > > from a static addn-hosts= to a dhcp
this a misconfiguration, or is there another way to support
> IPv4 + IPv6 DHCP, but especially DNS service for both address
> types for the same machine?
a misconfiguration could be at client side.
DHCP client not telling it's hostname to the DHCP server
during the request.
> Thanks.
Ple
ybooks_templating.html
in other words: The "converter" already exists.
> In fact, that's where my idea came from.
Please keep sharing ideas.
Groeten
Geert Stappers
--
Silence is hard to parse
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-dis
On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 09:10:42AM +0100, Petr Menšík wrote:
> On 3/13/21 6:38 AM, Geert Stappers via Dnsmasq-discuss wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 09:10:03PM +, Simon Kelley wrote:
> >> On 12/03/2021 15:47, Ken Gillett wrote:
> >>
> >> Just spec
On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 10:40:37PM +0100, Geert Stappers via Dnsmasq-discuss
wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 08:39:28PM +, Simon Kelley wrote:
> > On 19/02/2021 12:35, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> > > On 18.02.21 22:50, Simon Kelley wrote:
> > >> That wiki
000: 5254 00e5 338a
>
> I also tried with constructor in dnsmasq.conf like
>
> dhcp-range=::1,:::, constructor=lan*,ra-names,64,2m
>
> but no changes.
>
> Any clue ?
At least share with us if --enable-ra is inplace.
Groeten
Geert Stappers
--
Silence is hard
On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 08:01:00AM -0400, Dominick C. Pastore wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 18, 2021, at 4:52 AM, Geert Stappers via Dnsmasq-discuss wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 10:40:37PM +0100, Geert Stappers via
> > Dnsmasq-discuss wrote:
> > > On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at
> Is there any trick on how to do this? Any help would be appreciated.
Sending a "Yeah, works for me" is indeed helpfull.
Groeten
Geert Stappers
--
Silence is hard to parse
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekel
-h, --no-hosts
Don't read the hostnames in /etc/hosts.
is maybe active.
And the
> cname=*.dnsdelegation.io,blackhole.inv
> cname=dnsdelegation.io,blackhole.inv
> local=/.dnsdelegation.io/
looks odd. Expiriment with removing the `local=` line.
Karma points for rep
86PC,"ltsp.ipxe",ltsp/ltsp.ipxe
| #pxe-service=tag:proxy,tag:iPXE,X86-64_EFI,"ltsp.ipxe",ltsp/ltsp.ipxe
| #pxe-service=tag:rpi,X86PC,"Raspberry Pi Boot ",unused
into something like[2]:
| tag:!iPXE,X86PC,ltsp/undionly.kpxe
| tag:!iPXE,X86-64_EFI,ltsp/snponly.efi
| tag:iP
On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 05:12:35PM +, Simon Kelley wrote:
> On 14/03/2021 14:35, Aaron Jones wrote:
> > On 07/03/2021 08:57, Geert Stappers via Dnsmasq-discuss wrote:
> >> --host-record=foo.example.org,NODATA,fd00::1
> >>
> >> Says what is wanted.
> >
; definitely be a unique feature of dnsmasq.
> > Comments, list members?
Firewall rules should be on network blocks.
IPv4 /32 blocks are valid network blocks,
rendering then to hosts is understandable.
But it defeats "firewall rules should be on network blocks".
DNS is unaware of net
host-record=foo.example.org,,fd00::1
>
> ... and this option returns the address exactly as given:
>
> --host-record=foo.example.org,0.0.0.0,fd00::1
>
> Any pointers?
Share the challenge you are facing with us.
Groeten
Geert Stappers
--
Silence is hard to
n, source, and manpage.
And `manpage` is a link to https://dnsmasq.org/docs/dnsmasq-man.html
Thanks for the feedback.
Groeten
Geert Stappers
--
Silence is hard to parse
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
On Sat, Mar 06, 2021 at 11:12:31PM +, Aaron Jones wrote:
> On 06/03/2021 19:22, Geert Stappers via Dnsmasq-discuss wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 06:50:39AM +, Aaron Jones wrote,
> > with Subject: dnsmasq's behaviour with configured static hosts is
> > uni
On Sun, Mar 07, 2021 at 09:35:30AM +0100, Cyberfusion wrote:
> Op 7 mrt. 2021 om 00:33 heeft Aaron Jones het volgende geschreven:
> > 06/03/2021 19:22, Geert Stappers via Dnsmasq-discuss wrote:
> > > Share the challenge you are facing with us.
> >
> > Put simply, I
> >
> >
>
> I'm using a sample of queries from my services, but I'm introducing an
> artificial qps with flame using this sample.
>
FWIW "this sample" did not reach my end of the Internet.
Please recieve
> > What are y
ize limit.
Hence "Copy and paste in bash"
sed --in-place -e 's/^[ \t]*$//' src/*.c src/*.h
git diff | wc # shows large line count
git diff -w# shows that it is only white space
git add src/*.c src/*.h
git commit -m "sed --in-place -e 's/^[ \t]*$//' src/*.c src/*.h
Makes empty
On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 12:13:17AM +0200, Geert Stappers via Dnsmasq-discuss
wrote:
Subject: Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] Was: PATCH Add DHCP6REPLY for DHCP6REBIND
> In-Reply-To: <20210408091641.30245-1-liaic...@huawei.com>
> On Thu, Apr 08, 2021 at 05:16:41PM +0800, Aichun Li wro
On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 08:39:28PM +, Simon Kelley wrote:
> On 19/02/2021 12:35, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> > On 18.02.21 22:50, Simon Kelley wrote:
> >> That wiki page is just word-soup as far as I am concerned. Does setting
> >> dmarc_moderation_action to "munge from" fix Etan's
as 2.76.
Back to
> dnsmasq: bad option at line 11 of /etc/dnsmasq.d/dnsmasq.conf
> bad option at line 11 of /etc/dnsmasq.d/dnsmasq.conf"
> Line 11: 'hostsfile='
My first thought would be "file versus directory". But man page from git
says:
--dhcp-hostsfile=
n-address=127.0.0.1
>
> # my boxes
> dhcp-host=3c:15:c2:d4:45:72,loki,192.168.1.104,12h
And that configuration is for which dnsmasq server?
Consider that a question from someone who would like
to better understand the setup.
192.168.1.2 and the "outside" 172.31.0.2 feels odd to me.
> Can someone assist me please on what I am missing?
>
> Thank you for your help,
>
> -- Bernd
>
Groeten
Geert Stappers
--
Silence is hard to parse
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
to mind. Consider that as an odd way to express
that adding technology is no garantee for instant improvement. ;-)
> Any guidance would be gratefully appreciated.
It doesn't work that way. Understand that the biggest change in the
"upgrade" was adding Docker to the equation. So tell more th
There should already be an end-address or mode when adding a netmask.
Also the date bumped.
Signed-off-by: Geert Stappers
---
man/dnsmasq.8 | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/man/dnsmasq.8 b/man/dnsmasq.8
index 4ad125b..2660abd 100644
--- a/man/dnsmasq.8
There should already be an end-address or mode when adding a netmask.
Also the date bumped.
Signed-off-by: Geert Stappers
---
man/dnsmasq.8 | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/man/dnsmasq.8 b/man/dnsmasq.8
index 4ad125b..680aaab 100644
--- a/man/dnsmasq.8
those routers usually get their IP address, default route and DNS servers from
> DHCP upstream servers.
>
> In this case, all those parameters were hardly overwritten (apparently by
> instalator), which is strange, but the OS _MAY_ contain scripts that use
> information from DHC
bash script so is unlikely to have dependencies etc.)
Please be a better community member. Tell more about your side of
the story. Share here the two versions of /etc/init.d/dnsmasq One
version is "the Raspberry Pi version", the other "xubuntu". Doing so
makes it possible
On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 04:58:10PM +0200, Harald Jensas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We are seeing an issue whit network booting over DHCPv6 is failing.
> The UEFI firmware is starting two DHCPv6 transactions, with separate IAID's.
> Initially one transactions succeeds, while the other transaction fails
>
On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 08:23:47AM +0200, Harald Jensas wrote:
> On 9/14/21 21:12, Geert Stappers via Dnsmasq-discuss wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 04:58:10PM +0200, Harald Jensas wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > We are seeing an issue whit network booting ov
if the variables contain whitespaces.
> similar with other variables across the scripts.
Yep. Here in mono-spaced font that clearly visible.
> You may look at your config file to find the culprit or run init script in
> verbose mode, if you dare:
>
>
> sh -x /etc/init.d/dnsmasq
thing else I can do to get more diagnostics?
Do see already that dnsmasq is started (with some PID)
And there is another dnsmasq, probably a dnsmasq script,
with another PID.
Answering "And how is dnsmasq started? What is in configuration file?"
might reveal what is the oth
; > the ending dot on the service (just like the manual also has) and that's
> > > exactly the same.
> > >
> >
> > Try querying xmpp-client._tcp.mydomain.home
> >
>
> No result.
Please elaborate
Provide the output the dig command that is used
and what dnsmasq
On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 02:29:57AM +0300, Otto Modinos wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 09:50:54PM +0200, Geert Stappers via Dnsmasq-discuss
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 07:51:02PM +0300, Otto Modinos wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 02:02:59PM +
Summary: insult accepted, try again
On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 09:59:42PM +0530, Gocool.. wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 3:34 PM Geert Stappers wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 10:47:35AM +0530, Gocool.. wrote:
> > > Hi Team,
> > >
> > > I am using the dnsmasq
ducing a unicast FORCERENEW
message which forces the client to the RENEW state. The behaviour
for hosts using the DHCP INFORM message to obtain configuration
information is also described.
)
I understand why it isn't yet implemented. I don't understand why
there was no "patches welcome&
e.org/
BootROM downloads (over TFTP) and starts iPXE executable.
iPXE downloads over HTTP or HTTPS kernel & initrd and starts them.
> I believe in the pxelinux.cfg file
> ( or similar ) you typically set ramdisk_size= and that needs to have
> enough room to hold the initrd. You
elete stuff?
SIGHUP is actual "flush all and reread all"
Between flush all and all reread, there can be DNS queries
which then can't be answered as when all have been rereaded.
> John Doe
Groeten
Geert Stappers
--
Silence is hard to parse
_
ffice.
>
> If you want the clients to also be able to communicate with other
> networks, e.g. the Internet, then you may wish to consider also
> specifying options 3 and 6.
It will original poster get started.
And to start is good.
> Alex
Groeten
Geert Stappers
--
Silence is hard
AAA`.
I'm yet not capable of using the new feature.
You must help me.
I already told that two days ago.
You MUST help me NOW.
Regards Entitled
> Cheers,
>
> T
Groeten
Geert Stappers
--
Silence is hard to parse
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
ed only for those
domains and they are queried only using the specified
server. ...
New syntax could be
--server=[/[]/[domain/]][[#]][/no-{A,}][@][@[#]]
when filtered dropping gets implement.
Regards
Geert Stappers
Another person not
; > Cheers,
> >
> > Simon.
> >
> >
> Hi Simon,
Hello Mailinglist,
> Glad to hear it might be a known issue.
> I'll test that patch and report back.
Do know that patch is already in git repository.
So no need reason to worry about how to apply it.
I look
all queries and patches I should have responded to but didn't, to
> feed back to me once I have some time.
>
>
> Normal service will be resumed as soon as I can organise it.
>
semi-acknowledge.
What should we imaginate?Days? Weeks? Months?
>
> Cheers,
> S
On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 10:56:02PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 02:48:27PM +0530, Shrenik Bhura wrote:
> > On Wed, 20 Oct, 2021, 11:21 Geert Stappers wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 07:50:58AM +0530, Shrenik Bhura wrote:
> > > >
On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 02:48:27PM +0530, Shrenik Bhura wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Oct, 2021, 11:21 Geert Stappers wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 07:50:58AM +0530, Shrenik Bhura wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Dominik,
> >
> > Hello Archive visitor,
> > Hello Mail
address as the default hostname when none is present.
So beside the
/sbin/tcpdump -w rpi.pcap ether host dc:a6:32:78:98:ae
also
/sbin/tcpdump -w worksfine.pcap ether host MAC_address_of_known_good
> Best,
> Shrenik
Please make it possible to read in the discussion. Show the world
tha
9367]: read /etc/hosts - 4 addresses
>
> and now DNS resolution works again!
>
> No idea why dnsmasq is automatically detecting one change in
> /etc/resolv.conf,
> and it apparently is one that does not contain any servers.
>
And what about the crashes?
&g
running the binary you just built?
That information is indeed missing.
> > W T F
> Why so rude?
Quoting http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
section "How To Answer Questions in a Helpful Way"
Be gentle. Problem-related stress can make people seem rude or stupid
Dnsmasq then uses both of these configuration files.
>
> Thank you for your time!
Thank you for sharing the sed script that was mentioned two or three
postings by you earlier. It is now in the mailinglist archive.
> Alkis
Groeten
Geert Stappers
--
Silence is hard to parse
using an email programm that adds 'In-Reply-To: ' header.
Groeten
Geert Stappers
--
Silence is hard to parse
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
ng an TXT, MX or A record.
It doesn't mather if the request travels
over IPv6 or IPv4.
And other please, an pretty please:
Embrace evolution
Embrace mental growth
Groeten
Geert Stappers
P.S. To those who feel insulted by this posting
Consider the suffering when being ignored
my findings that this is currently not possible with
> dnsmasq.
>
> If so please accept my feature request to implement that.
Patches to this mailinglist do get noticed.
Groeten
Geert Stappers
--
Silence is hard to parse
___
Dnsmasq-discuss m
t;
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Simon.
> >
> >>
> >> PS: sending this message again, because patch #2 were big enough to
> >> require moderator's approval. Compressed it as a workaround.
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >>
p-hosts into its DNS view
> even when these clients are offline?
> Otherwise I guess I could write a bash script that converts a dhcp-hosts
> file into an addn-hosts file with lines like:
>
> 192.168.67.100 rpi
Yes, that way is DHCP not involved.
> Thank you,
> Alkis Georgopo
r GUI available?
>
>
> Thanks, KevinSent from my T-Mobile 4G LTE Device
Groeten
Geert Stappers
--
Silence is hard to parse
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
file 'raspiModelFoo.pcap' (ModelFoo replaced with
your actual model of RaspberryPI
* Save the .pcap somewhere on the Internet where it can be fetched.
* Share the URL with the mailinglist. Karma bonus points for an URL
that can be used with `wget`.
Groeten
Geert Stappers
--
Silence is hard
On Sun, Dec 05, 2021 at 09:21:17AM +0100, Community Member wrote:
> Follow up from "RaspberryPi PCAP file" thread.
>
> On Sat, Dec 4, 2021 at 1:42 PM Geert Stappers wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 04, 2021 at 12:11:13PM -0800, Carl Karsten wrote:
> > > On Sat, Dec 4, 202
EClient,1,0.0.0.0 sends the encapsulated
vendor class-specific option "mftp-address=0.0.0.0" to any
client whose vendor-class matches "PXEClient".
I think the " (IPv4 only) " implies DHCPv6 is not DHCP.
> Thanks.
Thanks for what? (to be read as &qu
t; Any ideas how I can get this working?
Start with research if "DHCPv6" has such feature.
Groeten
Geert Stappers
--
Silence is hard to parse
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
[20581]: using nameserver 10.x.xx.75#53
> Jan 3 20:06:04 dnsmasq[20581]: using nameserver 192.168.178.1#53
>
> If dnsmasq is restarted to work around the problem,
> then after stopping VPN:
>
> Jan 3 19:55:18 dnsmasq[18927]: using nameserver 10.x.xx.60#53
>
>
> Could you p
ettings on the server, not
> have anything baked into client machines.
Carl, original poster, will learn what the DHCP clients do
with what the DHCP server provides. I mean that having the
best server is meaningless when the clients don't understand it.
Groeten
Geert Stappers
--
On Sun, Nov 28, 2021 at 11:55:59PM -0800, Carl Karsten wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 28, 2021 at 11:20 PM Geert Stappers wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 28, 2021 at 03:44:38PM -0800, Carl Karsten wrote:
> > > I don't think DHCP supports this, but I'm not sure.
> > >
> > > C
5
has.
As I read RFC 3442 I would expect
dhcp-option=121, 24,192,168,1,1,2,3,4, 8,10,5,6,7,8
So destination 192.168.1.0/24 encoded as 24,192,168,1
and destination 10.0.0.0/8 encoded as 8,10
Groeten
Geert Stappers
--
Silence is hard to parse
;; Query time: 28 msec
;; SERVER: 9.9.9.9#53(9.9.9.9)
;; WHEN: do nov 25 18:44:52 CET 2021
;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 209
As I see it:
* the `dig -t A setup.icloud.com` is one single request
* the response comes from one single upstream server
* there is no need for Dnsmasq to redact the response
make skipping message
possible (huge time gain) and reading in the discussion
order possible (huge gain in logical thinking).
Regards
Geert Stappers
P.S.
Neither am I a native english speaker,
I might misreading "You must fix my problem!", no hard feelings.
___
501 - 600 of 740 matches
Mail list logo
