Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Snapshot archives downloaded from gitweb are not versioned properly

2022-09-12 Thread Geert Stappers via Dnsmasq-discuss
On Mon, Sep 12, 2022 at 04:51:26PM +0800, Johnny S. Lee via Dnsmasq-discuss wrote: > On Mon, 12 Sept 2022 at 15:22, wrote: > > On Mon, 12 Sep 2022 08:26:14 +0200 Geert Stappers via Dnsmasq-discuss wrote: > > > On Mon, Sep 12, 2022 at 11:51:22AM +0800, Johnny S. Lee via >

[Dnsmasq-discuss] Picking up the patches

2022-09-17 Thread Geert Stappers via Dnsmasq-discuss
Hi, IIRC there is only one patch pending, the "describe" patch. In https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2022q3/016577.html is reported that it is yak shaving[1] and work in progress. If I'm wrong about no ignored patches, say so. It is the whole idea of this message, picking

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Make HighLoad constant value configurable from config.h

2022-09-18 Thread Geert Stappers via Dnsmasq-discuss
On Sun, Sep 18, 2022 at 05:03:10PM +0300, Серж ИвановЪ wrote: > Just to bump this one up as a pending patch for next release URL to the patch http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/attachments/20220410/61f66c1b/attachment.bin found in https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/d

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] min-cache-ttl overriding neg-ttl

2022-09-20 Thread Geert Stappers via Dnsmasq-discuss
On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 10:41:29AM -0400, Glenn Fowler wrote: > Hello, > > I have observed that if min-cache-ttl time is greater than neg-ttl time, > then the neg-ttl time is ignored and negative responses are cached at the > min-cache-ttl time. > > The expected behavior should be that neg-ttl is

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] dnsmasq On Subnets - Failing

2022-10-03 Thread Geert Stappers via Dnsmasq-discuss
On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 07:06:36PM +0530, Zetacloud wrote: > Hi. > > Thank you, Simon and "john doe" for your responses. I forgot to fix the > mailing list options to get individual emails, only digests, so I can't > respond individually. echo -e '\x57\x54F\0077' and lets hope that meanwhile the

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Problem with dynamic upstream nameservers in dnsmasq 2.87

2022-10-10 Thread Geert Stappers via Dnsmasq-discuss
On Sun, Oct 09, 2022 at 06:21:53PM -0500, Christopher J. Madsen wrote: > I have configured dnsmasq and openresolv as described in > https://unix.stackexchange.com/a/575449/2421 so that the DNS servers > provided by the VPN are only used for the domains on that network. > > With dnsmasq 2.86 and op

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] What does this reply to 'host' mean?

2022-10-16 Thread Geert Stappers via Dnsmasq-discuss
On Sun, Oct 16, 2022 at 01:34:26PM +0100, Chris Green wrote: > I have been moving some domains around on my hosting provider and for > one I'm getting the following rather strange response to a 'host' > command:- > > chris$ host www.jacquibennett.com > www.jacquibennett.com is an alias for

[Dnsmasq-discuss] picking up patches

2022-10-17 Thread Geert Stappers via Dnsmasq-discuss
On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 09:26:39PM +0100, Simon Kelley wrote: Subject: Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Problem with dynamic upstream nameservers in dnsmasq 2.87 In-Reply-To: <13bd0bd5-3cd9-cb5c-a7a4-955c0ebe1...@thekelleys.org.uk> > Thank you very much for the information below. Having that saved me a lo

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] dnsmasq: dhcp-server with disabled dns-server: /etc/hosts ignored

2022-10-22 Thread Geert Stappers via Dnsmasq-discuss
On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 11:23:28PM +0200, Michael Traxler wrote: > Hello, > > dnsmasq-2.87: > > It took me quite some time to figure this out :-) > > When you disable the DNS-server via > port=0 > > the /etc/hosts file is ignored and also the > addn-hosts= > is ignored. > > This then results i

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Dnsmasq 2.85 stopped resolving dns zones.

2022-10-22 Thread Geert Stappers via Dnsmasq-discuss
On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 03:43:48PM +0300, Dach Shong wrote: > Hello. > > Dnsmasq 2.85 stopped resolving dns zones. When did it stop? > My system: > Debian 11 > dnsmasq 2.85 > > cat /etc/dnsmasq.conf > > listen-address=127.0.0.1 > bind-interfaces > domain-needed > no-dhcp-interface=lo > bogus

[Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] Removed empty last lines

2022-10-22 Thread Geert Stappers via Dnsmasq-discuss
Files src/domain-match.c and src/metrics.c had empty last lines. Now has the last line of those files more than just white space. Signed-of-by: Geert Stappers --- src/domain-match.c | 1 - src/metrics.c | 1 - 2 files changed, 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/domain-match.c b/src/domain-ma

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] Removed empty last lines

2022-10-22 Thread Geert Stappers via Dnsmasq-discuss
On Sat, Oct 22, 2022 at 09:26:53PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote: > Files src/domain-match.c and src/metrics.c had empty last lines. > Now has the last line of those files more than just white space. > > Signed-of-by: Geert Stappers > --- > src/domain-match.c | 1 - > src/metrics.c | 1 - >

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] Connection track mark based DNS query filtering.

2022-10-23 Thread Geert Stappers via Dnsmasq-discuss
On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 09:34:53PM +0100, Etan Kissling wrote: > This extends query filtering support beyond what is currently possible > with the `--ipset` configuration option, by adding support for: > 1) Specifying allowlists on a per-client basis, based on their >associated Linux connection

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] dnsmasq unit tests!

2022-10-23 Thread Geert Stappers via Dnsmasq-discuss
On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 04:32:01PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote: > On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 09:08:09PM +0200, Petr Menšík wrote: > > My previous message is waiting for moderation, since my patch is a big one. > > > > On 5/12/20 10:51 PM, Geert Stappers wrote: > > > On Mon, May 04, 2020 at 05:02:38PM

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] Connection track mark based DNS query filtering.

2022-10-23 Thread Geert Stappers via Dnsmasq-discuss
On Sun, Oct 23, 2022 at 10:15:47AM +0200, Geert Stappers via Dnsmasq-discuss wrote: > On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 09:34:53PM +0100, Etan Kissling wrote: > > This extends query filtering support beyond what is currently possible > > with the `--ipset` configuration option, by adding sup

[Dnsmasq-discuss] Coding Style

2022-10-23 Thread Geert Stappers via Dnsmasq-discuss
In-Reply-To: <20221022202018.cxxx2lag6dxqg...@gpm.stappers.nl> Previous-Subject: Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] Removed empty last lines On Sat, Oct 22, 2022 at 10:20:18PM +0200, Geert Stappers via Dnsmasq-discuss wrote: > On Sat, Oct 22, 2022 at 09:26:53PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:

[Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH 2/6] Removed trailing white spaces

2022-10-23 Thread &#x27;Geert Stappers via Dnsmasq-discuss
From: Geert Stappers This was done by sed --in-place -e 's/[\t ]*$//' src/*.c src/*.h However, this is an **empty** commit, The diff would be too big for the mailinglist. The commit hash is needed for in .git-blame-ignore-revs ___ Dnsmasq-discuss

[Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH 3/6] Tell `git blame` which commits to ignore

2022-10-23 Thread &#x27;Geert Stappers via Dnsmasq-discuss
From: Geert Stappers new file: .git-blame-ignore-revs That file has commit-hash of commit to ignore and information on how to activate it. --- .git-blame-ignore-revs | 9 + 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) create mode 100644 .git-blame-ignore-revs diff --git a/.git-blame-ignore-revs

[Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH 5/6] Better description of Coding Style

2022-10-23 Thread &#x27;Geert Stappers via Dnsmasq-discuss
From: Geert Stappers And the CS needs more tuning. --- .clang-format | 7 ++- CodingStyle | 7 +++ 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/.clang-format b/.clang-format index 75d465b..ada50d2 100644 --- a/.clang-format +++ b/.clang-format @@ -1,3 +1,8 @@ +# +# Ma

[Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH 4/6] Created file .clang-format

2022-10-23 Thread &#x27;Geert Stappers via Dnsmasq-discuss
From: Geert Stappers I did clang-format --assume-filename=.c --style=GNU --dump-config and redirected that to .clang-format. For coding style I should have pick a better match from webpage https://clang.llvm.org/docs/ClangFormatStyleOptions.html Item that complies with dnsmasq coding style

[Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH 6/6] Extended Makefile with format target

2022-10-23 Thread &#x27;Geert Stappers via Dnsmasq-discuss
From: Geert Stappers For keeping the source code in shape, you do: make format or just make fmt File CodingStyle has `make fmt` documented for being closer to the "Go-lang" and/or the "Rust" world. --- CodingStyle | 7 +++ Makefile| 9 + 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+)

[Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH 1/6] new file: CodingStyle

2022-10-23 Thread &#x27;Geert Stappers via Dnsmasq-discuss
From: Geert Stappers Documents how to indent. (further codingstyle will be machine readable) --- CodingStyle | 8 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) create mode 100644 CodingStyle diff --git a/CodingStyle b/CodingStyle new file mode 100644 index 000..5457dd8 --- /dev/null +++ b/Codin

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] Offer alternative DHCPv6 address if requested is taken

2022-10-27 Thread Geert Stappers via Dnsmasq-discuss
On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 12:38:37PM +0200, Petr Menšík wrote: > On 10/21/22 12:25, Petr Menšík wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I am attaching a change, which has been part of RHEL/CentOS Stream 9 for > > some while [1]. It fixes the problem with DHCPv6 only requests, which on > > some situations fail to pro

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Reserved IP Addresses for Specific DHCP Clients without a Connection to the Subnet

2022-10-29 Thread Geert Stappers via Dnsmasq-discuss
On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 06:44:36PM -0400, Rich Otero via Dnsmasq-discuss wrote: > On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 7:15 AM Simon Kelley wrote: > > On 27/10/2022 11:49, Simon Kelley wrote: > > > Rich Otero: > > > > dnsmasq v2.75 ... > > > > > > strange things were happening, which I'll look into

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Multiple Shared Networks?

2022-10-31 Thread Geert Stappers via Dnsmasq-discuss
On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 10:15:19AM -0400, Rich Otero via Dnsmasq-discuss wrote: > My dnsmasq server provides DHCP for more than one hundred subnets like this: > > dhcp-range=set:172.18.14.0-24,172.18.14.0,static,255.255.255.0 > > dhcp-option=tag:172.18.14.0-24,option:router,172.18.14.1 > > dhcp-

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] DNS recursion only works in debug mode

2022-10-31 Thread Geert Stappers via Dnsmasq-discuss
On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 03:59:56PM +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Dnsmasq-discuss wrote: > Hello, > > I have upgraded my router which included upgrading dnsmasq 2.80 to 2.86. > > (Turris OS 5.4.4 based on openwrt 19 to 6.0.1 based on OpenWrt 21.02.05) > > in the current version, dnsmasq retu

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] dnsmasq: dhcp-server with disabled dns-server: /etc/hosts ignored

2022-11-01 Thread Geert Stappers via Dnsmasq-discuss
On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 09:07:40PM +, Simon Kelley wrote: > On 21/10/2022 22:23, Michael Traxler wrote: > > Hello, > > > > dnsmasq-2.87: > > > > It took me quite some time to figure this out :-) > > > > When you disable the DNS-server via > > port=0 > > > > the /etc/hosts file is ignored an

[Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] new file: CodingStyle

2022-11-03 Thread &#x27;Geert Stappers via Dnsmasq-discuss
From: Geert Stappers Documents how to indent. (further codingstyle will be machine readable) --- CodingStyle | 8 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) create mode 100644 CodingStyle diff --git a/CodingStyle b/CodingStyle new file mode 100644 index 000..5457dd8 --- /dev/null +++ b/Codin

[Dnsmasq-discuss] Retransmitting: [PATCH] new file: CodingStyle

2022-11-03 Thread &#x27;Geert Stappers via Dnsmasq-discuss
On Thu, Nov 03, 2022 at 04:25:00PM +0100, 'Geert Stappers wrote: > new file: CodingStyle > > Documents how to indent. It is the part of coding style we agree on. > (further codingstyle will be machine readable) > --- > CodingStyle | 8 > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) > create mod

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] dnsmasq mishandles some cases when bad dns response packet is received

2022-11-12 Thread Geert Stappers via Dnsmasq-discuss
On Sat, Nov 12, 2022 at 10:30:09AM +0800, ZhangJiangyu 张江瑜 via Dnsmasq-discuss wrote: > Hi, > > Description > > When the DNS forwarder iteratively queries the malicious domain name > server, it returns some malformed dns packets, and dnsmasq returns the > packet to the client without proper veri

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] dnsmasq mishandles some cases when bad dns response packet is received

2022-11-13 Thread Geert Stappers via Dnsmasq-discuss
On Sun, Nov 13, 2022 at 10:23:55AM +0800, zhangJiangyu via Dnsmasq-discuss wrote: > On Sat, Nov 12, 2022 at 04:15:38PM +0800, Geert Stappers via Dnsmasq-discuss > wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 12, 2022 at 10:30:09AM +0800, ZhangJiangyu 张江瑜 via > > Dnsmasq-discu

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] Make ECC-GOST optional only

2022-11-13 Thread Geert Stappers via Dnsmasq-discuss
On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 06:02:44PM +0100, Petr Menšík wrote: > Hi! > > I were testing my builds on rootcanary.org test, where dnsmasq is the only > one failing with DNSSEC validation enabled. I am not sure why, I think gost > crypto algorithm might be broken intentionally on Fedora or RHEL for leg

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] dnsmasq mishandles some cases when bad dns response packet is received

2022-11-14 Thread Geert Stappers via Dnsmasq-discuss
On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 11:15:13AM +0800, zhangjiangyu via Dnsmasq-discuss wrote: > On Sun, Nov 13, 2022 at 9:15:43PM +0800, Geert Stappers via Dnsmasq-discuss > wrote: > > > > > > > > > However I don't understand the problem. > > >

[Dnsmasq-discuss] Picking up the patches

2022-11-17 Thread Geert Stappers via Dnsmasq-discuss
Hi, Another 17th day of the month. Patches for which it is unclear when they should resubmitted: * Offer alternative DHCPv6 address if requested is taken ( Petr Mensik ) * Coding style ( Geert Stappers ) * Connection track mark based DNS query filtering * Make ECC-GOST ( Petr Mensik )

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Picking up the patches

2022-11-17 Thread Geert Stappers via Dnsmasq-discuss
On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 07:58:05PM +0100, Geert Stappers via Dnsmasq-discuss wrote: > Hi, > > > Another 17th day of the month. > > Patches for which it is unclear when they should resubmitted: > > * Offer alternative DHCPv6 address if requested is taken ( Petr Mensi

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] dnsmasq mishandles some cases when bad dns response packet is received

2022-11-18 Thread Geert Stappers via Dnsmasq-discuss
On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 11:15:08AM +0800, zhangjiangyu via Dnsmasq-discuss wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Nov 15, 2022 at 8:15:00PM +0800, Petr Menšík wrote: > > Interesting tests. > > > > But dnsmasq is somehow naive in parsing replied queries. It tries to > > deliver the response exactly as it were

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] assigning IP addresses to secondary subnets on the same vlan via dhcp relay

2022-11-19 Thread Geert Stappers via Dnsmasq-discuss
On Sun, Nov 20, 2022 at 12:00:19AM +0200, znu...@gmail.com wrote: > Hello, > > I've been struggling with this issue for over a year, and I'm still > not sure if this is a limitation of dnsmasq or I'm doing something > wrong. > > Situation: > > - core switch (Brocade) > - dnsmasq 2.87 running on

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] Optimize speed on massive server=/.../... records

2022-11-20 Thread Geert Stappers via Dnsmasq-discuss
On Sun, Nov 20, 2022 at 01:50:10PM +0800, Ye Zhou wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm attaching a patch to optimize a speed issue introduced in version 2.86. Now is the patch attached > I have two ISP upstreams and need to forward different sites to different > ISP's DNS providers. For example: > > serv

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Dynamic address config?

2022-11-23 Thread Geert Stappers via Dnsmasq-discuss
On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 01:47:27PM +0800, Feng Shao wrote: > There are a bunch of machines in our lab, and we normally don't have DNS > records configured for them, only accessing by IP. In order to ssh to them > with key auth, I have a config in my .ssh/config like > > Host *.mylab > User root

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] dnsmasq mishandles some cases when bad dns response packet is received

2022-11-23 Thread Geert Stappers via Dnsmasq-discuss
On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 10:56:20AM +0800, zhangjiangyu via Dnsmasq-discuss wrote: > On 23/11/2022 07:21, Simon via Dnsmasq-discuss wrote: > > > > The main argument for this seems to be a security one: the client may > > not handle a malformed packet, and a suitably crafted malformed packet > >

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] dnsmasq mishandles some cases when bad dns response packet is received

2022-11-23 Thread Geert Stappers via Dnsmasq-discuss
On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 09:42:28PM +0100, Petr Menšík wrote: > On 19. 11. 22 0:12, Geert Stappers via Dnsmasq-discuss wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 11:15:08AM +0800, zhangjiangyu via Dnsmasq-discuss > > wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 15, 2022 at 8:15:00PM

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Dynamic address config?

2022-11-24 Thread Geert Stappers via Dnsmasq-discuss
On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 08:47:28AM +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > On 24.11.22 10:10, Feng Shao wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 5:28 PM Geert Stappers wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 01:47:27PM +0800, Feng Shao wrote: > > > > There are a bunch of machines in our lab, and we normally

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] dnsmasq mishandles some cases when bad dns response packet is received

2022-11-27 Thread Geert Stappers via Dnsmasq-discuss
On Sat, Nov 26, 2022 at 10:26:46PM +, Simon Kelley wrote: > On 24/11/2022 02:40, zhangjiangyu via Dnsmasq-discuss wrote: > > On 24/11/2022, zhangjiangyu via Dnsmasq-discuss wrote: > > > > > > After I read rfc5625, I understand what you mean. you are right. > > > |Section 4.3 writes: > > > | >

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Feature request: DHCP options 100 and 101

2022-11-29 Thread Geert Stappers via Dnsmasq-discuss
On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 08:10:18PM +, Donald Muller wrote: > From: Dnsmasq-discuss, on behalf of Joe Pfeiffer, Sent: Tuesday, November 29, > 2022 2:25:59 PM > > > > At present, dnsmasq supports DHCP option 2 (time-offset), but does > > not support options 100 (TZ-POSIX string) or 101 (TZ-Data

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] dnsmasq returns malformed dns packets when bad dns request or response packet is received

2022-12-03 Thread Geert Stappers via Dnsmasq-discuss
On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 07:57:58PM +0800, 黄泸明 via Dnsmasq-discuss wrote: > Hi, Hello, > Description:1、When dnsmasq received malformed dns request packets as > a DNS forwarder, it forwards the packets to the upstream name server > without proper verification.2、When the DNS forwarder iteratively

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] dnsmasq mishandles some cases when bad dns response packet is received

2022-12-03 Thread Geert Stappers via Dnsmasq-discuss
On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 02:36:46PM +0100, Geert Stappers via Dnsmasq-discuss wrote: > On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 11:15:13AM +0800, zhangjiangyu via Dnsmasq-discuss > wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 13, 2022 at 9:15:43PM +0800, Geert Stappers via Dnsmasq-discuss > > wrote: > > &g

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] dnsmasq mishandles some cases when bad dns response packet is received

2022-12-03 Thread Geert Stappers via Dnsmasq-discuss
On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 12:12:50AM +0100, Geert Stappers via Dnsmasq-discuss wrote: > On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 11:15:08AM +0800, zhangjiangyu via Dnsmasq-discuss > wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 15, 2022 at 8:15:00PM +0800, Petr Menšík wrote: > > > > > > But I admit w

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] listening on multiple ports at the same time

2022-12-06 Thread Geert Stappers via Dnsmasq-discuss
On Tue, Dec 06, 2022 at 08:40:57PM +, Simon Kelley wrote: > On 06/12/2022 18:51, Gordon Shawn wrote: > > can dnsmasq listen on different ports(e.g. 53, 5353,5354,5355) in the > > same time with a single process running? each port can have its own > > configuration. so far I invoke multiple dnsm

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Man page typo

2022-12-07 Thread Geert Stappers via Dnsmasq-discuss
On Tue, Dec 06, 2022 at 08:08:11PM -0600, Ruijie Yu via Dnsmasq-discuss wrote: > Hello, > > I noticed that there is a typo in the man page for the example on the > `--conf-script` option. The example says `--conf-dir="..."` but it > should be `--conf-script="..."` instead. Good catch. > For co

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] listening on multiple ports at the same time

2022-12-08 Thread Geert Stappers via Dnsmasq-discuss
On Wed, Dec 07, 2022 at 03:11:53PM +0100, Matthias May via Dnsmasq-discuss wrote: > On 12/6/22 19:51, Gordon Shawn wrote: > > can dnsmasq listen on different ports(e.g. 53, 5353,5354,5355) in the > > same time with a single process running? each port can have its own > > configuration. so far I in

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Multiple Shared Networks?

2022-12-14 Thread Geert Stappers via Dnsmasq-discuss
On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 08:52:29PM +, Simon Kelley wrote: > On 31/10/2022 14:15, Rich Otero via Dnsmasq-discuss wrote: > > My dnsmasq server provides DHCP for more than one hundred subnets like this: > > > > dhcp-range=set:172.18.14.0-24,172.18.14.0,static,255.255.255.0 > > dhcp-option

[Dnsmasq-discuss] Picking up the patches

2022-12-17 Thread Geert Stappers via Dnsmasq-discuss
Hi, There is the manual page patch, "conf-script patch" ( https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2022q4/016776.html ) that needs to be merged IMNSHO. If there need other patches to picked up, say so. Groeten Geert Stappers -- Silence is hard to parse __

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Change upstream server for client

2022-12-18 Thread Geert Stappers via Dnsmasq-discuss
On Sun, Dec 18, 2022 at 11:10:21AM -0500, Jonathan Stafford wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 18, 2022 at 10:36 AM Michael Smith wrote: > > > On 12/18/22 06:59, Jonathan Stafford wrote: > > > > > prequel, completely made up: > > > > > > > > LAN is 192.168.6.0/24 > > > > Dnsmasq is at 192.168.6.10 > > > >

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Change upstream server for client

2022-12-18 Thread Geert Stappers via Dnsmasq-discuss
On Sun, Dec 18, 2022 at 06:12:33PM +0100, Geert Stappers via Dnsmasq-discuss wrote: > On Sun, Dec 18, 2022 at 11:10:21AM -0500, Jonathan Stafford wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 18, 2022 at 10:36 AM Michael Smith wrote: > > > On 12/18/22 06:59, Jonathan Stafford wrote: > > > &g

<    1   2   3