or less, depending on
the current situation. Adjusting the config with every jail redeployment
seems overkill to me, to be honest.
I'd be glad if an option that tells dnsmasq it's allowed to use a
specific IP existed, against the wildcard listening socket.
Cheers,
--
László Károlyi
http
will
talk to the unbound jail's IP address (127.0.0.20), when querying for
outside DNS.
Sounds complicated, but this is what I'd like to get done, so it would
work with both IPv6 AND IPv4.
Cheers,
--
László Károlyi
http://linkedin.com/in/karolyi
On 2020-07-21 17:00, Petr Menšík wrote:
> How sho
-match=set:wpad-ignore,wpad
dhcp-ignore-names=tag:wpad-ignore
rebind-domain-ok=/rfc-ignorant.org/sorbs.net/uribl.com/surbl.org/dnswl.org/njabl.org/spamhaus.org/spamcop.net/barracudacentral.org/
Cheers,
--
László Károlyi
http://linkedin.com/in/karolyi
On 2020-07-21 14:42, Petr Menšík wrote:
>
proper DNS responses. This was something I did pay extra attention to
get it working from the get-go. See:
Citing my configs here makes no sense as you can see it's working already.
Cheers,
--
László Károlyi
http://linkedin.com/in/karolyi
On 2020-07-20 16:12, Petr Menšík wrote:
> Hi Lás
and make dnsmasq able
to differentiate between local IPs, in order to be able to use them for
DNS resolution.
Cheers,
--
László Károlyi
http://linkedin.com/in/karolyi
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
it
got held up by mailman.
Cheers,
--
László Károlyi
https://linkedin/com/in/karolyi
On 06.07.20 23:05, Simon Kelley wrote:
> OK, I can see the proximate cause of the problem, but I'm not sure
> what's causing it and I'm not sure how behaviour needs to change.
>
> The pro
failed requests. I
didn't look into it in detail, but the sheer size should indicate a lot
of failed requests.
Cheers,
--
László Károlyi
http://linkedin.com/in/karolyi
On 2020-07-06 00:41, László Károlyi wrote:
> Hey Simon,
>
> thanks for your response.
>
> Yes, my bad, I s
rly.
Best Regards,
--
László Károlyi
https://linkedin/com/in/karolyi
On 05.07.20 23:17, Simon Kelley wrote:
> Just a stab in the dark: are you sure that the clocks on these machines
> are accurate? DNSSEC signatures have validity periods and when I checked
> obsswitcher.com its start-of-val
hostname resolution succeeds at first time, sometimes it takes
200+ tries until it succeeds once, and quits. The attached log is the
one where it happened 200+ times before succeeding.
Any help is appreciated.
Cheers,
--
László Károlyi
http://linkedin.com/in/karolyi
<>
signature.a
