Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] FW: Cachesize

2017-04-11 Thread Nathan Downes
Thanks Eric, Dnsmasq has public ip, allow list limits what can access it. But after reading up on Unbound today it might be a better option. We don't use DHCP for any of the connections, either subnet allocated or PPP/VPDN/L2TP connection. Getting about a 90% hit rate on cache over last coupl

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] FW: Cachesize

2017-04-10 Thread Nathan Downes
. It is just a small VM with Dnsmasq, SMTP relay and STUN server. I will check out other options then if I am pushing the limits of capability -Original Message- From: Petr Mensik [mailto:pemen...@redhat.com] Sent: Monday, 10 April 2017 8:51 PM To: Nathan Downes Cc: dnsmasq-discuss

[Dnsmasq-discuss] FW: Cachesize

2017-04-10 Thread Nathan Downes
Hi, I understand this is hardcoded to a limit of 1 but we use it for a small ISP network and quite often reach this, is it possible to make it 25000 in next release? Everyone has the choice at loading what to set it to, so I can't see how this would cause issues. I would prefer to just use

[Dnsmasq-discuss] Is this possible? different response for a certain IP range

2014-05-25 Thread Mr Nathan Downes
Hi, I want to use dnsmasq for general caching of DNS, listening on a public IP and an internal IP used for NAT PPPOE clients (172.16.x.x). I want one address when the internet NAT clients request it to return an internal IP but not for anyone else.. i.e any other ip requests whats.th