Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] Support --server syntax in resolv-file

2017-04-07 Thread Kristian Evensen
Hi Simon, On Sat, 8 Apr 2017 at 00:21, Simon Kelley wrote: > I understand the desire to be able to specify resolvers dynamically with > the full set of source-address and routing options; that's actually > already available, and has been for a long time, using the DBus

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] bug: trunk DHCP offer/replies being ignored by some devices

2017-04-07 Thread Pedro MG Palmeiro
The latest firmware for the printer is from 2015. This is one of those shared Epson/Fuji/Xerox models which I believe is entering EOL, since there is already another printer called M200 (Ecotank). Anyway, I'll report it. Should the the implementation be correct in dnsmasq, then there will be more

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] bug: trunk DHCP offer/replies being ignored by some devices

2017-04-07 Thread Simon Kelley
On 06/04/17 14:01, Pedro MG Palmeiro wrote: > Dnsmasq trunk replies are being ignored by some devices, in my case, two > epson printers (AL-M200). > Dnsmasq 2.76 works fine. > > This could be related with > http://thekelleys.org.uk/gitweb/?p=dnsmasq.git;a=commit; >

[Dnsmasq-discuss] Blacklist selection per dhcp-host?

2017-04-07 Thread Art Greenberg
I am currently using addn-hosts for DNS blacklisting. All of the dhcp client machines on my network use static assignment via dhcp-host entries in the config file. Running dnsmasq version 2.48 on Centos 6 (yes, I'm aware its old but that seems to be the most recent version in the Centos 6

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH v2] Add --dhcp-reply-delay option to delay DHCP replies

2017-04-07 Thread Simon Kelley
On 30/03/17 12:38, Floris Bos wrote: > Adds option to delay replying to DHCP packets by one or more seconds. > This provides a workaround for a PXE boot firmware implementation > that has a bug causing it to fail if it receives a (proxy) DHCP > reply instantly. > > On Linux it looks up the exact

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] Support --server syntax in resolv-file

2017-04-07 Thread Simon Kelley
The overriding objection to this is that it adds to the syntax and semantics of the resolv-file format, but dnsmasq doesn't "own" that format: it's actually a libc configuration file, and dnsmasq takes advantage of the fact that the format is "well known" to extract useful information from it. If