[Dnsmasq-discuss] FW: Cachesize

2017-04-10 Thread Nathan Downes
Hi, I understand this is hardcoded to a limit of 1 but we use it for a small ISP network and quite often reach this, is it possible to make it 25000 in next release? Everyone has the choice at loading what to set it to, so I can't see how this would cause issues. I would prefer to just

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] Support --server syntax in resolv-file

2017-04-10 Thread Kristian Evensen
Hi Simon, On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 11:27 PM, Simon Kelley wrote: > The overriding objection to this is that it adds to the syntax and > semantics of the resolv-file format, but dnsmasq doesn't "own" that > format: it's actually a libc configuration file, and dnsmasq takes

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] Support --server syntax in resolv-file

2017-04-10 Thread Vladislav Grishenko
Hi Kristian, FYI, changing resolv.conf format could lead libc resolver to fail, so it's quite dangerous change. As I understand, you want dynamic DNS servers update with additional info (interface/src ip binding). With no DBUS, can't it be done with --servers-file option (available since

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] Support --server syntax in resolv-file

2017-04-10 Thread Kristian Evensen
Hi, On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 1:53 PM, Vladislav Grishenko wrote: > FYI, changing resolv.conf format could lead libc resolver to fail, so it's > quite dangerous change. > As I understand, you want dynamic DNS servers update with additional info > (interface/src ip

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] FW: Cachesize

2017-04-10 Thread Petr Mensik
Hi Nathan. If you hit a cache limit of 1 quite often, are you sure dnsmasq is still the best choice for that server? I think dnsmasq focuses on small home routers and end networks. Have you considered other caching resolver, unbound for example? I think if this limit is not enough, maybe

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] FW: Cachesize

2017-04-10 Thread Eric Luehrsen
Hi Nathan, Just thinking out loud: > There is only about 1000 endpoints of various types, from residential to business. Having worked with Unbound and dnsmasq, I would say the proverb "right tool for the right job applies." I would guess not all 1000 endpoints are on one subnet, maybe

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] FW: Cachesize

2017-04-10 Thread Nathan Downes
Hi Petr, I guess that is totally possible, I had just used it for a few other projects so figured if it works why not use it :) The only things I use are setting minimum cache ttl to 30 mins and max cache size to 10k. There is only about 1000 endpoints of various types, from residential to

[Dnsmasq-discuss] dnsmasq got if_nametoindex("lo”), expected was ipi_ifindex=1939

2017-04-10 Thread Rafael Folco
Hello, I’m facing an issue on dhcp_release and dnsmasq in OpenStack and would appreciate any help or pointers to find the root cause. Summary: dnsmasq is receiving if_nametoindex("lo”) instead of 1939, the index for tap2bb5e1af-d3 that was issued by dhcp_release command. The DHCP RELEASE