Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] dnsmasq & fingerbank.org

2017-05-12 Thread Ed W
On 09/04/2017 19:22, Denton Gentry wrote: https://fingerbank.org/about.html is a database of OS signatures based on the DHCP options populated and the order in which they appear. So for example, an Android device will typically send '1,33,3,6,15,26,28,51,58,59' while iOS sends '1,3,6,15,119,252'.

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] specifying dhcp options in proxy mode

2017-05-12 Thread Andriy Gapon
On 11/05/2017 14:36, Simon Kelley wrote: > The design is that dnsmasq sends the options expected by a PXE client if > it's acting as a proxy (because the whole proxy thing is part of the PXE > spec: a normal DHCP client doesn't know how to deal with it.) The > replies to the PXE client are construc

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] dhcp vendor-option and grub net_pxe_extensionspath

2017-05-12 Thread Simon Kelley
On 11/05/17 23:22, Carl Karsten wrote: > I am pondering something I am not sure I even want: I guess we can call > it a default option 209 > > Is this valid, reliable, predictable? > > dhcp-option-force=209,"partman-auto/disk=/dev/sda" > > dhcp-host=00:26:9e:03:9d:e5,set:negk,negk > dhcp-option-

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] DHCPv6: Add support for more than one hardware address per IPv6 address

2017-05-12 Thread Simon Kelley
On 09/05/17 10:21, Pali Rohár wrote: > On Sunday 02 October 2016 11:43:43 Pali Rohár wrote: >> On Wednesday 27 January 2016 13:37:27 Pali Rohár wrote: >>> On Wednesday 20 January 2016 20:15:23 Simon Kelley wrote: Dnsmasq identifies IPv6 clients via their MAC address for the purpose of sel

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] DHCPv6: Add support for more than one hardware address per IPv6 address

2017-05-12 Thread Pali Rohár
On Friday 12 May 2017 17:15:20 Simon Kelley wrote: > There are so many layers of quotes here that I've completely lost > track of what we were trying to achieve, and how to achieve it. My > memory is that we'd failed to come up with any consensus on either > of those. Goal 1: Ability to assign on

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [solved] define IPv6 prefix for host-records

2017-05-12 Thread Carsten Spieß
Hello Simon, > You're trying to invent yet another way of solving the "naming IPv6 > hosts" problem, yes ;) > made more difficult by the fact that they change > addresses as the delegated prefix changes. > There are a couple of other possibilities. > > 1) If you're using DHCP for IPv4, look a