Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Solaris specific patches to fix build failures and improve performance

On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 04:56:23PM +0100, libor.buk...@oracle.com wrote: > Hello, Welcome, > patches resolve the build failures, functionality, and performance issues on > Solaris. A brief description is included in each patch. > > Please let me know whether these patches could be merged patc

[Dnsmasq-discuss] 3 secs dhcp delay

Hi folks, I see a 3 to 4 secs delay for dnsmasq's dhcp protocol. Example: Strongswan's dhcp plugin obtains an IP address on behalf of the peer (a road warrior laptop). The strongswan logfile on the host says : Jan 14 10:48:07 18[IKE] peer requested virtual IP %any Jan 14 10:48:07 18[CFG] send

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Issues with CentOS 7 dnsmasq, stops resolving queries.

Is it possible that https://dnsflagday.net/ will affect dnsmasq on CentOS 7? If so what is important to do? I have tried to compile DNSMasq on CentOS 7 but it requires nettle-dev 3.X which doesn't exist on CentOS 7. I tried to compile an RPM and I succeed but there are some blocking in the way f

[Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] Change read_leases() to skip invalid entries

There's no reason to stop reading the existing lease file when dnsmasq is started and an invalid entry is found, it can just be ignored. This was fallout from an Openstack bug where the file was being written incorrectly with [] around IPv6 addresses. --- src/lease.c | 18 +- 1 f

[Dnsmasq-discuss] Issues with CentOS 7 dnsmasq, stops resolving queries.

Hey, I have couple CentOS 7 hypervisors and VM's. On the hypervisors I do not have any issue with dnsmasq as DHCP server but I have not tried using it as a DNS. On once machine I have the latest CentOS 7 dnsmasq version (2.7x) and for some reason while it run's queries against a local unbound se

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] IXFR requests and how they are handled

Dnsmasq returns an empty answer, which may not be correct, but is at least an answer, so I'm not sure where the timeout is coming from. >From RFC 1995 If incremental zone transfer is not available, the entire zone is returned. The first and the last RR of the response is the SOA record o

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Solaris specific patches to fix build failures and improve performance

On 14/01/2019 15:56, libor.buk...@oracle.com wrote: > Hello, > > patches resolve the build failures, functionality, and performance > issues on Solaris. A brief description is included in each patch. > > Please let me know whether these patches could be merged and which > changes are necessary

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Issues with CentOS 7 dnsmasq, stops resolving queries.

Setting log-queries in the dnsmasq config will get you some useful information. Simon. On 16/01/2019 21:26, elie...@ngtech.co.il wrote: > Hey, > > I have couple CentOS 7 hypervisors and VM's. > On the hypervisors I do not have any issue with dnsmasq as DHCP server but I > have not tried using i

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Fwd: [PATCH] fix entries in /etc/hosts disabling static leases

Patch applied, sorry for missing that in my review. Cheers, Simon. On 15/01/2019 22:45, Steven Siloti wrote: > On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 12:44 PM Kaas Baichtal > wrote: > > Hi, > > I tried to install this patch manually to my 2.80 and got a segfault > that

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] 3 secs dhcp delay

On 17/01/2019 10:30, Harald Dunkel wrote: > Hi folks, > > I see a 3 to 4 secs delay for dnsmasq's dhcp protocol. Example: > > Strongswan's dhcp plugin obtains an IP address on behalf of the peer (a > road warrior laptop). The strongswan logfile on the host says > > : > Jan 14 10:48:07 18[IKE]

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] Change read_leases() to skip invalid entries

Patch applied. Thanks. Simon. On 17/01/2019 20:50, Brian Haley wrote: > There's no reason to stop reading the existing lease file > when dnsmasq is started and an invalid entry is found, it > can just be ignored.  This was fallout from an Openstack > bug where the file was being written incorrect