Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Parsing limitation for big dns query responses in tcp

2019-03-26 Thread Philippe Lamhaut
Thank you Simon for your answer. The issue was not in dnsmasq. It was due to definition of dns response length in our application. Best regards, Philippe On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 6:00 PM Simon Kelley wrote: > Could you give more details on exactly how you're testing this? > Whereever that error

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Is wrapping close() in retry_send() required ?

2019-03-26 Thread Pali Rohár
On Wednesday 27 February 2019 17:07:21 Simon Kelley wrote: > On 27/02/2019 15:06, Bogdan Harjoc wrote: > > There are 50 calls to close() in dnsmasq-2.80, and 10 of them are > > wrapped in retry_send(). > > > > "man close" has this paragraph in the section "Dealing with error > > returns from

[Dnsmasq-discuss] misunderstanding negative caching

2019-03-26 Thread alexander.v.litvak
Dear list, I configured dnsmasq with enabled negative cache and neg-ttl 600.  I attempted to use it with a query that times out (configured fake dns servers in the config file).  When I ping a host, I have NXDOMAIN in logs.  However, every time I ping it dnsmasq asks those servers to resolve the

[Dnsmasq-discuss] misunderstanding negative cache

2019-03-26 Thread Alex Litvak
Dear list, I configured dnsmasq with enabled negative cache and neg-ttl 600. I attempted to use it with a query that times out (configured fake dns servers in the config file). When I ping a host I have NXDOMAIN in logs. However every time I ping it dnsmasq asks those servers to resolve the