I'm inclined not to take these, on the grounds that complicated
preprocessor stuff is a greater evil than false-positive warnings on
unusual platforms for build configurations.
Simon.
On 10/03/2020 10:25, Kevin 'ldir' Darbyshire-Bryant wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> Feel free to throw these patches awa
Patch attached.
On 17.03.20 21:54, Simon Kelley wrote:
>
> On 11/03/2020 07:55, Dominik wrote:
>> Hey Buck,
>>
>> dnsmasq blocks all IPv4 address replies in the "private" subnets when
>> enabling stop-dns-rebind. For IPv6, it blocks only the IPv4-mapped address
>> ranges matching said private su
On 17/03/2020 21:48, Dominik wrote:
> Patch attached.
and applied. Thanks.
Simon.
>
> On 17.03.20 21:54, Simon Kelley wrote:
>>
>> On 11/03/2020 07:55, Dominik wrote:
>>> Hey Buck,
>>>
>>> dnsmasq blocks all IPv4 address replies in the "private" subnets when
>>> enabling stop-dns-rebind. For
Simon,
Hosts in domain .consul are resolved by DNS servers forwarding requests to
a consul clusters. I also have hard coded direct consul server records for
.consul in dnsmasq config. Nothing in /etc/hosts . Consul returns records
with TTL 0 . I perhaps wrongly thought it meant they are not ca
On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 08:31:17PM -0500, Sasha Litvak wrote:
> I couldn't find a specific answer anywhere so hopefully someone has a
> clue on this list
>
> We are using dnsmasq on our servers as a caching dns solution.
>
> Most of our domains are resolved by a wildcard record like this
>
> $TT
Geert,
Just in case, .consul is not a registered domain name. It is assigned
with Hashicorp consul service discovery product and is internal to us.
Whence forwarders.
On Tue, Mar 17, 2020, 9:08 AM Sasha Litvak
wrote:
> Geert,
>
> What is the meaning of this?
>
> On Tue, Mar 17, 2020, 1:48 AM
Geert,
What is the meaning of this?
On Tue, Mar 17, 2020, 1:48 AM Geert Stappers wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 08:31:17PM -0500, Sasha Litvak wrote:
> > I couldn't find a specific answer anywhere so hopefully someone has a
> > clue on this list
> >
> > We are using dnsmasq on our servers as
On 17/03/2020 01:31, Sasha Litvak wrote:
> I couldn't find a specific answer anywhere so hopefully someone has a
> clue on this list
>
> We are using dnsmasq on our servers as a caching dns solution.
>
> Most of our domains are resolved by a wildcard record like this
>
> $TTL 3600 ; 1 hour
On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 09:08:15AM -0500, Sasha Litvak wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 17, 2020, 1:48 AM Geert Stappers wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 08:31:17PM -0500, Sasha Litvak wrote:
> > > ...
> > > We are using dnsmasq on our servers as a caching dns solution.
> > > ...
> > > dnsmasq handles re
On 10/03/2020 14:25, Petr Menšík wrote:
> That is a pity. Is there anything I can help to include it in 2.81? If
> you have any objections to part of it or whole concept, please say so. I
> would rebase the change again.
>
> I was added to Fedora as downstream in late summer [1], have not yet
On 11/03/2020 07:55, Dominik wrote:
> Hey Buck,
>
> dnsmasq blocks all IPv4 address replies in the "private" subnets when
> enabling stop-dns-rebind. For IPv6, it blocks only the IPv4-mapped address
> ranges matching said private subnets.
>
> Neither ULAs nor LLs (link-locals) are blocked in
11 matches
Mail list logo