Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] Re: pxe-service entries in dnsmasq conf seem to fail non-proxy EFI boot

2021-10-07 Thread Simon Kelley
As an aside the the discussion, can I just point out that I don't have any way to test any of this dnsmasq functionality at the moment, and I'm very rusty on the PXE spec, especially as it relates to EFI. I don't therefore have much to contribute to this discussion, but I do think this is

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Bug while using address=//::

2021-10-07 Thread Simon Kelley
On 30/09/2021 05:15, E wrote: >> IPv6 connectivity > > Why dnsmasq can't drop , when the server has no IPv6 connectivity at > all? This doesn't make sense. > Something like "no-ipv6" or "ipv4-only" switch would be really nice > here... > > > dnsmasq.conf simple example > >

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Domain specific TTL control options

2021-10-07 Thread Simon Kelley
On 07/10/2021 11:29, Tobias via Dnsmasq-discuss wrote: > Hi, > > it would be useful (at least for me), to have a "min-cache-ttl" variant > that's no affecting all but only very specific domains, e.g.: > > min-cache-ttl=/example.net/600 > > Afaik dnsmasq treats this generally as domain suffixes

[Dnsmasq-discuss] Monthly posting

2021-10-07 Thread Monthly posting
Hi, "How To Ask Questions The Smart Way" has immediately after the introduction an advice on before you ask. http://www.catb.org/esr/faqs/smart-questions.html#before Following that advice is still no guarantee for a quick response. So when you are still stuck with something that you think

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] DNS from dhcp-host while client is offline

2021-10-07 Thread Simon Kelley
On 04/10/2021 13:37, Dominik Derigs wrote: > Initially, I've myself found this an odd behavior to only serve > only DHCP host names that are known to be "alive". I do see some > value in not serving A records when we know the server is > offline, however, the very same happens on the Internet all

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] DNSSEC and all-servers

2021-10-07 Thread Simon Kelley
On 07/10/2021 10:59, Tobias via Dnsmasq-discuss wrote: > Hi, > > when "dnssec" and "all-servers" are set, according to the log it seems > queries are usually forwarded to all upstream servers as expected, but > the internal "dnssec-query"s are not, they are only sent to one, which > is unexpected

[Dnsmasq-discuss] ignore-address cannot handle IPv6

2021-10-07 Thread E
1. Add ignore-address=:XXX:XXX::/48 to conf file 2. Restart dnsmasq 3. It will throw "error at line" IPv4-CIDR is fine, IPv6 is not. ___ Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Bug while using address=//::

2021-10-07 Thread E
Changing "filter-" to "filter-A" in dnsmasq.conf = same error Remove "filter-" and restart = no error ___ Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Bug while using address=//::

2021-10-07 Thread E
Well well... I never thought you actually cared. This is just what I needed! Thanks a lot!! I couldn't wait for deb packaging so I tried it myself. 1. Install it over default dnsmasq mkdir tmp1 cd tmp1 git clone http://thekelleys.org.uk/git/dnsmasq.git make make install cd ~ rm -r tmp1/ 2.

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Latest master may not compile

2021-10-07 Thread Simon Kelley
Ah, good point. Patch applied, and complimentary tag included. Cheers, Simon. On 07/10/2021 08:31, Dominik Derigs wrote: > Hey Simon, > > ad32ca18a753c264bb702e2b6f19e2d7f1de1612 added > >> +#if defined(HAVE_IDN) || defined(HAVE_LIBIDN2) || >> defined(LOCALEDIR) >> +#include >> +#endif >

[Dnsmasq-discuss] Latest master may not compile

2021-10-07 Thread Dominik Derigs
Hey Simon, ad32ca18a753c264bb702e2b6f19e2d7f1de1612 added > +#if defined(HAVE_IDN) || defined(HAVE_LIBIDN2) || > defined(LOCALEDIR) > +#include > +#endif above > #include "dnsmasq.h" However, many projects (incl. ours) define the compile-time options in config.h which is sourced through

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] Re: pxe-service entries in dnsmasq conf seem to fail non-proxy EFI boot

2021-10-07 Thread Shrenik Bhura
Hey Petr, Some screenshots that may be helpful - bios-proxy-fail : https://drive.google.com/file/d/1KtG2mgIPIU9Ny3AGLjkIfzcOB90jaYFj/view?usp=sharing efi-proxy-fail : https://drive.google.com/file/d/1L1223jrsS68XcHBE5B9wrAP3n7Db1OrF/view?usp=sharing On Thu, 7 Oct 2021 at 12:36, Shrenik Bhura

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] Re: pxe-service entries in dnsmasq conf seem to fail non-proxy EFI boot

2021-10-07 Thread Shrenik Bhura
Hi Petr, Thanks for all your help. Have done a build from the fork shared above. Herein are the test results. Now: Rpi + proxy success Rpi + noproxy success Efi + proxy failure Efi + noproxy success BIOS + proxy failure BIOS + noproxy success Earlier it was only: Efi + noproxy failure I

[Dnsmasq-discuss] DNSSEC and all-servers

2021-10-07 Thread Tobias via Dnsmasq-discuss
Hi, when "dnssec" and "all-servers" are set, according to the log it seems queries are usually forwarded to all upstream servers as expected, but the internal "dnssec-query"s are not, they are only sent to one, which is unexpected with "all-servers". (They are also not balanced but more like 16:1

[Dnsmasq-discuss] Domain specific TTL control options

2021-10-07 Thread Tobias via Dnsmasq-discuss
Hi, it would be useful (at least for me), to have a "min-cache-ttl" variant that's no affecting all but only very specific domains, e.g.: min-cache-ttl=/example.net/600 Afaik dnsmasq treats this generally as domain suffixes for matching, which I dislike. I think for this this in particular but