Is it possible to ask dnsmasq to ignore DNS responses whose records match a
certain list of ip, and keep waiting for another response?
The rational behind this is that in China, when querying a domain like
youtube.com or twitter.com, a fake ip is quickly returned, fooling dnsmasq to
discard
trailing spaces in the code? I did flow the coding style of dnsmasq
though)
ignore-address.patch
Description: Binary data
On Oct 9, 2014, at 10:48 PM, Simon Kelley si...@thekelleys.org.uk wrote:
On 08/10/14 13:13, Glen Huang wrote:
Is it possible to ask dnsmasq to ignore DNS responses whose records
Hey Simon,
Is the patch good for merging?
I have been personally using the patch for over a month without problems.
On Oct 9, 2014, at 10:48 PM, Simon Kelley si...@thekelleys.org.uk wrote:
On 08/10/14 13:13, Glen Huang wrote:
Is it possible to ask dnsmasq to ignore DNS responses whose
ote:
>
>
>
>> On Sep 28, 2021, at 9:16 PM, Glen Huang > <mailto:hey...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have a router and a dump AP that are connected with a wire. The router has
>> two interfaces, one is for LAN (192.168.1.1/24) an
Hi,
I have a router and a dump AP that are connected with a wire. The router has
two interfaces, one is for LAN (192.168.1.1/24) and the other for WAN. The AP
also has two interfaces, one is for LAN (192.168.1.2/24), the other for guest
WiFi (192.168.2.1/24). (It actually also has a LAN WiFi,
Hi,
I have two interfaces on my router, one for home and the other for office. I’d
like for clients from home and office to use different upstream DNS servers.
I know I can use two Dnsmasq instances to achieve that, but that prevents the
two types of clients to access each other by host names
gt; On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 10:16:00AM +0800, Glen Huang wrote:
>> it seems impossible for the router to take over guest WiFi’s DHCP,
>> since it’s based on AP’s interfaces
>
> Just make the wired link between your router and the AP trunking, on
> the AP bridge
