On 6/12/20 9:47 am, Kristof Mattei wrote:
PS:
Due to Docker’s inability to get link-local addresses on a macvlan (I
cannot set a fixed, public prefix, as mine changes) I cannot assign an
IPv6 address to pi-hole. Otherwise I’d do that.
Could you set up an IPv6 ULA instead?
Hamish
__
On 13/1/21 2:11 pm, Hongyi Zhao wrote:
I'm very confused on the above problem. Any hints/comments/suggestions
will be highly appreciated.
I think that something is intercepting your UDP DNS requests and
replying with the 192.168.1.1 result, probably to block you from
www.baidu.com. But they f
I'm attempting to override the DNS server for a few hosts on both IPv4
and IPv6. I've tagged the hosts and applied dhcp-option to that tag and
it's working correctly for IPv4, but I'm not having much luck with IPv6.
I'll admit right now that I don't fully understand the use of DHCPv6 and
how D
On 25/3/21 7:50 pm, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
How is Android always learning of the dnsmasq server itself as the DNS
server, and can I fix it?
Forgot to add, my dnsmasq is provided by OpenWRT (latest release 19.07.7):
Dnsmasq version 2.80 Copyright (c) 2000-2018 Simon Kelley
Compile time
each requests. It
should help you checking selected hosts got assigned adblock tag to
whatever rule you have used. And then just set common options for the tag.
On 3/25/21 9:50 AM, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
I'm attempting to override the DNS server for a few hosts on both IPv4
and IPv6. I
On 26/3/21 2:52 am, M. Buecher wrote:
Android to my knowledge does not support DHCPv6, therefore it only
retrieves DNS servers via RDNSS of RAs.
RAs are generic and not per client, therefore assigning different DNS
servers via RDNSS/RA is not possible.
Even if dnsmasq could disable RDNSS for
On 6/10/21 09:11, Petr Menšík wrote:
On 10/5/21 20:28, john doe wrote:
Those tools are not standards, for instance on OpenWRT.
dig is quite standard thing for troubleshooting DNS. If it is not
available for OpenWRT, it should be fixed. I am bind9 maintainer too, it
might get surprising to me. F
On 11/10/21 14:33, E wrote:
# dnsmasq --conf-file=/etc/dnsmasq.conf
dnsmasq: unsupported option at line 12 of /etc/dnsmasq.conf
What does "where dnsmasq" say? Are you actually running the binary you
just built?
W T F
Why so rude?
Hamish
___
On 11/10/21 17:58, E wrote:
--- --- --- --- ---
interface=lo
listen-address=127.0.0.1
bind-interfaces
## testver
server=1.2.3.4#53
server=1.2.3.4#53
server=1.2.3.4#53
server=1.2.3.4#53
rev-server=1.2.3.4/24,1.2.3.4
bogus-priv
cache-size=1337
dnssec-check-unsigned=no
dnssec-no-timecheck
domain
I've got dnsmasq listening on multiple interfaces (two VLANs), and at
least one client that is also on both VLANs at once. The client has the
same MAC address on both VLANs. I'd like to assign an IP address on each
VLAN via DHCP.
I have the following in my config:
dhcp-host=38:C9:86:40:86:37,
On 5/9/22 10:57, hamish@moffatt.email wrote:
On 29/8/22 18:43, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
I've got dnsmasq listening on multiple interfaces (two VLANs), and at
least one client that is also on both VLANs at once. The client has
the same MAC address on both VLANs. I'd like to assign an
Hi,
I'm running dnsmasq 2.86 on OpenWRT (22.03.3). I have a single dnsmasq
providing DNS and DHCP on 3 interfaces succesfully.
Now I've added a 4th which will be DNS only, so it isn't explicitly
mentioned in the configuration file at all. When I make a DNS query from
that interface, dnsmasq
I've recently enabled DNSSEC on dnsmasq, and signed a zone that I work
with a lot.
It works for a while (dig shows the AD (authentic data) flag on signed
zones), but after about a week, I start getting lookup failures for that
zone until I restart dnsmasq. Then it works for another week. The D
On 29/06/17 07:05, Simon Kelley wrote:
Your text says 2.75, but the log says 2.76. There's a significant
difference between the two in DNSSEC code.
First thing to do is to turn on --log-queries and arrange for the (quite
large) logs to go somewhere safe, if the router has limited storage.
That s
On 29/06/17 09:42, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
On 29/06/17 07:05, Simon Kelley wrote:
Your text says 2.75, but the log says 2.76. There's a significant
difference between the two in DNSSEC code.
First thing to do is to turn on --log-queries and arrange for the (quite
large) logs to go somewhere
On 03/07/17 18:35, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
Jul 3 16:58:38 router daemon.info dnsmasq[11219]: validation
foo2.foo.com is ABANDONED
Now I have this again 24 hours later, and I also have some saying
validation foo2.foo.com is BOGUS
Hamish
Hi,
I'm trying to enable DNSSEC validation in dnsmasq 2.80, on my OpenWRT
router. For upstream, I'm using 1.1.1.1. With DNSSEC validation on, when
I visit the Cloudflare test site
https://www.cloudflare.com/ssl/encrypted-sni/ , it says it can't
determine if I have secure DNS enabled.
It's
looks, at least superficially, similar. It
might be worth turning on DNS logging and seeing if the similarity goes
deeper.
Cheers,
Simon.
Simon.On 17/07/2019 06:41, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to enable DNSSEC validation in dnsmasq 2.80, on my OpenWRT
router. For upstream, I&#
On 23/10/19 8:04 am, Sean Warner wrote:
Hello,
Thank you for answering Uwe. Your response gave me some good pointers.
I don’t think a “default domain” entry is coming from my Windows
laptop. It’s Windows 7 Home Premium and that version knows nothing
about domains. I googled that and also to
19 matches
Mail list logo
