Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] pxe-service line for UEFI system?

2020-01-28 Thread Michal Zatloukal
On Wed, 22 Jan 2020 at 21:43, Geert Stappers wrote: >... > > FWIW > Over here is "PXE service" not used. I have no idea what I might be > missing. My reason for involvement in this thread is finding what use > case O.P. has for dnsmasq. Finding out if it can improve my use case, > finding out if

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] pxe-service line for UEFI system?

2020-01-22 Thread Geert Stappers
On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 11:34:01PM +0100, Michal Zatloukal wrote: > On Mon, 20 Jan 2020 at 21:38, Geert Stappers wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 19, 2020 at 10:40:28PM +0100, Michal Zatloukal wrote: > > > On Sun, 19 Jan 2020 at 21:45, Geert Stappers wrote: > > > > > > > > Please do make the extra mile > > >

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] pxe-service line for UEFI system?

2020-01-20 Thread Michal Zatloukal
On Mon, 20 Jan 2020 at 21:38, Geert Stappers wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 19, 2020 at 10:40:28PM +0100, Michal Zatloukal wrote: > > On Sun, 19 Jan 2020 at 21:45, Geert Stappers wrote: > > > On Sun, Jan 19, 2020 at 08:33:54PM +0100, P W wrote: > > > > On Sun, Jan 19, 2020 at 07:30:44PM +0100, Michal Zatl

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] pxe-service line for UEFI system?

2020-01-20 Thread Geert Stappers
On Sun, Jan 19, 2020 at 10:40:28PM +0100, Michal Zatloukal wrote: > On Sun, 19 Jan 2020 at 21:45, Geert Stappers wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 19, 2020 at 08:33:54PM +0100, P W wrote: > > > On Sun, Jan 19, 2020 at 07:30:44PM +0100, Michal Zatloukal wrote: > > > > On Wed, 8 Jan 2020 at 00:16, Michal Zatlou

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] pxe-service line for UEFI system?

2020-01-19 Thread Michal Zatloukal
Yeah - sorry, I'm not much help when it comes to C code. I was coming in with assumption my config was somehow incorrect. What is expected of dnsmasq - a DHCP offer with either a populated menu, or a populated boot-filename option. As mentioned in the OP, currently dnsmasq provides broken menu (no

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] pxe-service line for UEFI system?

2020-01-19 Thread Geert Stappers
On Sun, Jan 19, 2020 at 08:33:54PM +0100, P W wrote: > On Sun, Jan 19, 2020 at 07:30:44PM +0100, Michal Zatloukal wrote: > > On Wed, 8 Jan 2020 at 00:16, Michal Zatloukal wrote: > > > > > > In the meantime, I tried a simpler case [1] of UEFI PXE services > > > config, which I confirmed to work. >

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] pxe-service line for UEFI system?

2020-01-19 Thread P W
On Sun, Jan 19, 2020 at 07:30:44PM +0100, Michal Zatloukal wrote: > On Wed, 8 Jan 2020 at 00:16, Michal Zatloukal wrote: > > > > In the meantime, I tried a simpler case [1] of UEFI PXE services > > config, which I confirmed to work. > > > > I intended to replace my config with this and work up tow

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] pxe-service line for UEFI system?

2020-01-19 Thread Michal Zatloukal
Finally got to troubleshoot this today... The issue arises when there's only a single "proper" pxe-service configured (one that actually has a boot-filename defined). Is this expected? So this works: pxe-prompt="dnsmasq menu" pxe-service=7, "Boot UEFI CSA 7", efi64/syslinux.efi pxe-service=7, "Oth

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] pxe-service line for UEFI system?

2020-01-07 Thread Michal Zatloukal
In the meantime, I tried a simpler case [1] of UEFI PXE services config, which I confirmed to work. I intended to replace my config with this and work up towards the fancier tag-operated version, but made a wrong assumption and _added_ the trivial config to existing set of config files (adding .ba

[Dnsmasq-discuss] pxe-service line for UEFI system?

2020-01-06 Thread Michal Zatloukal
Hi. I'm putting together a "booting section" fo my config, where I want to provide various boot images, according to the machine architecture provided by the client. As I understand the pxe-service functionality, there are 2 ways to to netboot: - either provide bootfile-name (67), which the client