On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 7:25 AM, Simon Kelley si...@thekelleys.org.uk wrote:
On 14/03/13 01:57, Sheng Yang wrote:
Interesting, the newer version seems no longer allow such line in the
configuration file?
dhcp-range=fc00:3:1602::7473,96,static
dnsmasq keeps complaining about bad dhcp-range,
On 14/03/13 01:57, Sheng Yang wrote:
Interesting, the newer version seems no longer allow such line in the
configuration file?
dhcp-range=fc00:3:1602::7473,96,static
dnsmasq keeps complaining about bad dhcp-range, for version 2.66test21.
Use the 2.62 is fine(though different cidr not working
On 07/03/13 22:38, Sheng Yang wrote:
Hi Simon,
Any chance you can reproduce it?
If dhcp-range can accept a prefix rather than 64 then hand it out, I
think dhcp-host should also able to do so...
I just tested 2.66test21, and it worked fine for me. I didn't test
earlier code.
I've
Hi Simon,
Any chance you can reproduce it?
If dhcp-range can accept a prefix rather than 64 then hand it out, I
think dhcp-host should also able to do so...
--Sheng
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 2:58 AM, Simon Kelley si...@thekelleys.org.uk wrote:
On 20/02/13 02:16, Sheng Yang wrote:
Hi Simon,
On Fri, 2013-03-01 at 16:58 -0500, Pavel Simerda wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Joakim Langlet joakim.lang...@seaview.se
Pavel and Dan,
Thank you for your answers. It makes it a lot easier for me to
understand the problems I have with Ubuntu 12.04 and also Debian
Wheezy
Pavel and Dan,
Thank you for your answers. It makes it a lot easier for me to
understand the problems I have with Ubuntu 12.04 and also Debian Wheezy
RC-1 currently.
I use DHCPv6 for address assignment (nicely serviced by dnsmasq) and
radvd is used to announce the /96 networks. This all works. I
On Sat, 2013-02-23 at 12:24 +0100, Joakim Langlet wrote:
tis 2013-02-19 klockan 18:02 -0600 skrev Dan Williams:
On Tue, 2013-02-19 at 21:06 +, Simon Kelley wrote:
So, I did some testing. I configured an server interface with
prefix-length 96, and configured dnsmasq with a dhcp-range
tis 2013-02-19 klockan 18:02 -0600 skrev Dan Williams:
On Tue, 2013-02-19 at 21:06 +, Simon Kelley wrote:
So, I did some testing. I configured an server interface with
prefix-length 96, and configured dnsmasq with a dhcp-range and 96 prefix.
Using dhclient, I got a lease
So, I did some testing. I configured an server interface with
prefix-length 96, and configured dnsmasq with a dhcp-range and 96 prefix.
Using dhclient, I got a lease successfully.
The only problem is that dhclient configured the client's interface with
prefix-length 64.
I moment's thought
Hi Simon,
Did you use dhcphost option? dhcp-range works for me(if I specify a
range), but not with dhcp-host option(when I specify dhcp-range as
static).
--Sheng
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 1:06 PM, Simon Kelley si...@thekelleys.org.uk wrote:
So, I did some testing. I configured an server
tis 2013-02-12 klockan 20:36 -0800 skrev Sheng Yang:
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 6:48 PM, Brian Haley brian.ha...@hp.com wrote:
On 02/12/2013 05:43 PM, Sheng Yang wrote:
I am also a little dubious here, but if people want to get some
smaller subnet, do they able to get it anyway on IPv6?
On 12/02/13 22:42, Sheng Yang wrote:
No, it still doesn't work.
I am using Debian package, version 2.62.
Would it be possible to try 2.65 instead? A lot of fixes have gone into
the DHCPv6 code since 2.62. 2.65 is in unstable, or the stuff required
to build a Debian package is in the dnsmasq
Same result with 2.65... I just compiled it and tried.
--Sheng
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 1:42 PM, Simon Kelley si...@thekelleys.org.uk wrote:
On 12/02/13 22:42, Sheng Yang wrote:
No, it still doesn't work.
I am using Debian package, version 2.62.
Would it be possible to try 2.65 instead? A
Sadly it's just a typo... I added it because I am failed to get it work.
After restart dnsmasq, it would not listen on dhcp-server port, based
on netstat output.
Here is the correct line of dhcphost.txt
id:00:03:00:01:06:4f:66:00:00:2e,[fc00:3:1602::dca1],vvt1,infinite
--Sheng
On Tue, Feb 12,
On 12/02/13 22:00, Sheng Yang wrote:
Sadly it's just a typo... I added it because I am failed to get it work.
After restart dnsmasq, it would not listen on dhcp-server port, based
on netstat output.
Here is the correct line of dhcphost.txt
I am also a little dubious here, but if people want to get some
smaller subnet, do they able to get it anyway on IPv6?
--Sheng
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 1:06 PM, Brian Haley brian.ha...@hp.com wrote:
On 02/08/2013 09:59 PM, Sheng Yang wrote:
Hi Simon,
I found I can't assign IPv6 address for
On 02/12/2013 05:43 PM, Sheng Yang wrote:
I am also a little dubious here, but if people want to get some
smaller subnet, do they able to get it anyway on IPv6?
You typically use a /64 on a link, but you can use longer. The problem is that
address auto-configuration will only work if the
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 6:48 PM, Brian Haley brian.ha...@hp.com wrote:
On 02/12/2013 05:43 PM, Sheng Yang wrote:
I am also a little dubious here, but if people want to get some
smaller subnet, do they able to get it anyway on IPv6?
You typically use a /64 on a link, but you can use longer.
On 09/02/13 02:59, Sheng Yang wrote:
Hi Simon,
I found I can't assign IPv6 address for /96 subnet.
I specified DHCP range use 96 bits prefixes:
dhcp-range=fc00:3:1602::7473,96,static
And here is nic:
2: eth0:BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast
state UP qlen 1000
Yes, I just tried, and that works.
I am using dhcp-host files to assign all the ips on the network, I
guess that's what goes wrong...
Here is the file content:
id:00:03:00:01:06:4f:66:00:00:2e,[fc00:3:1602::dca1/96],test1,infinite
And config file:
resolv-file=/etc/dnsmasq-resolv.conf
20 matches
Mail list logo
