Any help on how I can comply to '4.4' would be appriciated.
On 12/21/2019 9:12 AM, john doe wrote:
> On 12/21/2019 7:41 AM, john doe wrote:
>> Thank you, Simon for your answer.
>>
>> On 12/20/2019 6:36 PM, Simon Kelley wrote:
>>> On 18/12/2019 11:19, john doe wrote:
On 12/18/2019 11:29 AM, Ku
On 12/21/2019 7:41 AM, john doe wrote:
> Thank you, Simon for your answer.
>
> On 12/20/2019 6:36 PM, Simon Kelley wrote:
>> On 18/12/2019 11:19, john doe wrote:
>>> On 12/18/2019 11:29 AM, Kurt H Maier wrote:
On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 08:46:22AM +0100, john doe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I wa
Thank you, Simon for your answer.
On 12/20/2019 6:36 PM, Simon Kelley wrote:
> On 18/12/2019 11:19, john doe wrote:
>> On 12/18/2019 11:29 AM, Kurt H Maier wrote:
>>> On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 08:46:22AM +0100, john doe wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering what is the state of (1) with regard t
On 18/12/2019 11:19, john doe wrote:
> On 12/18/2019 11:29 AM, Kurt H Maier wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 08:46:22AM +0100, john doe wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I was wondering what is the state of (1) with regard to Dnsmasq?
>>>
>>> Any help is appriciated.
>>>
>>> 1) https://tools.ietf.org/html/r
On 12/18/2019 11:29 AM, Kurt H Maier wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 08:46:22AM +0100, john doe wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I was wondering what is the state of (1) with regard to Dnsmasq?
>>
>> Any help is appriciated.
>>
>> 1) https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8375
>
> It works.
>
> Are you looking for so
On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 08:46:22AM +0100, john doe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was wondering what is the state of (1) with regard to Dnsmasq?
>
> Any help is appriciated.
>
> 1) https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8375
It works.
Are you looking for something in particular?
khm
___
