On 24/01/2021 22:12, Simon Kelley wrote:
> On 24/01/2021 11:38, Matthias Andree wrote:
>> Am 23.01.21 um 02:34 schrieb Lonnie Abelbeck:
On Jan 22, 2021, at 4:33 PM, Simon Kelley wrote:
Apolgies about your wasted time. Once more with 2.84test3 ?
>>> Thanks Simon, 2.84test3 solves
On 24/01/2021 11:38, Matthias Andree wrote:
> Am 23.01.21 um 02:34 schrieb Lonnie Abelbeck:
>>> On Jan 22, 2021, at 4:33 PM, Simon Kelley wrote:
>>>
>>> Apolgies about your wasted time. Once more with 2.84test3 ?
>> Thanks Simon, 2.84test3 solves all "failed to send packet" logs in my
>> testing
> Once more with 2.84test3 ?
2.84test3 seems to work ok (in OpenWrt master).
Great.
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
> On Jan 22, 2021, at 4:33 PM, Simon Kelley wrote:
>
> Apolgies about your wasted time. Once more with 2.84test3 ?
Thanks Simon, 2.84test3 solves all "failed to send packet" logs in my testing
...
--
Jan 22 18:44:22 gw-lan daemon.info dnsmasq[3297]: started, version 2.84test3
cachesize 4096
;
Sent: Friday, January 22, 2021 3:48 PM
To:
dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk<mailto:dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] v2.83 failed to send packet: Network is
unreachable
Apolgies about your wasted time. Once more with 2.84test3 ?
Cheers,
Simon
On 2
Apolgies about your wasted time. Once more with 2.84test3 ?
Cheers,
Simon
On 22/01/2021 18:37, Hannu Nyman wrote:
>> Update: I missed a case.
>
>
> Possibly also something else.
>
> With 2.84test2, there are now three different errors:
>
>
> Fri Jan 22 20:32:49 2021 daemon.info
> Update: I missed a case.
Possibly also something else.
With 2.84test2, there are now three different errors:
Fri Jan 22 20:32:49 2021 daemon.info dnsmasq[12040]: started, version
2.84test2 cachesize 1000
...
Fri Jan 22 20:32:49 2021 daemon.info dnsmasq[12040]: read
Please apply the patch above and see if it fixes it.
Sorry, but no.
There is a new error: "failed to send packet: Not a socket"
Fri Jan 22 19:54:33 2021 daemon.info dnsmasq[11495]: started, version 2.84test1
cachesize 1000
Fri Jan 22 19:54:33 2021 daemon.info dnsmasq[11495]: DNS service
Update: I missed a case.
Simon.
thekelleys.org.uk/gitweb/?p=dnsmasq.git;a=commit;h=12af2b171de0d678d98583e2190789e50e02
On 22/01/2021 17:47, Simon Kelley wrote:
> On 22/01/2021 16:08, Hannu Nyman wrote:
>> I bisected the dnsmasq commits, and looks like it is caused by this:
>>
>>
On 22/01/2021 16:08, Hannu Nyman wrote:
> I bisected the dnsmasq commits, and looks like it is caused by this:
>
> 15b60ddf935a531269bb8c68198de012a4967156 FAIL
> 824461192ca5098043f9ca4ddeba7df1f65b30ba Ok ?
>
>
I bisected the dnsmasq commits, and looks like it is caused by this:
15b60ddf935a531269bb8c68198de012a4967156 FAIL
824461192ca5098043f9ca4ddeba7df1f65b30ba Ok ?
http://thekelleys.org.uk/gitweb/?p=dnsmasq.git;a=commit;h=15b60ddf935a531269bb8c68198de012a4967156
"Handle multiple identical near
, 2021 6:42 PM
> *To: *dnsmasq list <mailto:dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk>
> *Cc: *Steve Hirsch <mailto:stevehirsc...@msn.com>
> *Subject: *Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] v2.83 failed to send packet: Network is
> unreachable
>
>
>
>
>
>> O
of activity also generates errors.
>
> From: Lonnie Abelbeck
> Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2021 6:42 PM
> To: dnsmasq list
> Cc: Steve Hirsch
> Subject: Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] v2.83 failed to send packet: Network is
> unreachable
>
>
>
> > On Jan 21, 202
irsc...@msn.com>
Subject: Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] v2.83 failed to send packet: Network is
unreachable
> On Jan 21, 2021, at 5:53 PM, Steve Hirsch wrote:
>
> After upgrading dnsmasq from version 2.82 to version 2.83 on Arch Linux
> (kernel 5.10.9), “failed to send packet:
> On Jan 21, 2021, at 5:53 PM, Steve Hirsch wrote:
>
> After upgrading dnsmasq from version 2.82 to version 2.83 on Arch Linux
> (kernel 5.10.9), “failed to send packet: Network is unreachable” errors
> continually show up. However, name resolution still appears to work with
> v2.83.
15 matches
Mail list logo
