Michael StJohns writes:
> This is sort of what I meant. Still trying to get the authors to home
> in a definition for small/static and large/dynamic.
Random thought while reading the thread: we could state something very
small and simple rather than trying to approximate the future growth in
Recognizing that this thread has mostly wound down without agreement,
I'll at least add a data point. I agree that different applications may
behave differently depending on their specific situation and needs. I
do agree with Mike that automation is needed in the software, but what
to do is
