> On 13 Oct 2021, at 05:24, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
>
> On Sat, Oct 09, 2021 at 07:18:58AM +1100, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
>> Yes it will be unfiltered but the point of DNSSEC is to filter out bad
>> answers (that is what the ignore bogus responses achieves) and if you
>> are behind a recursive
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations WG of the IETF.
Title : Service binding and parameter specification via the
DNS (DNS SVCB and HTTPS RRs)
Authors :
On Sat, Oct 09, 2021 at 07:18:58AM +1100, Mark Andrews wrote:
> Yes it will be unfiltered but the point of DNSSEC is to filter out bad
> answers (that is what the ignore bogus responses achieves) and if you
> are behind a recursive server you need it to do the filtering of the
> answers it gets
The IESG has approved the following document:
- 'Revised IANA Considerations for DNSSEC'
(draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-iana-cons-05.txt) as Proposed Standard
This document is the product of the Domain Name System Operations Working
Group.
The IESG contact persons are Warren Kumari and Robert
Paul Wouters wrote:
>
> As a seperate problem in the 2nd references email, I agree that the
> term "in-bailiwick" probably changed meaning from "within this
> delegation or below" to "the data related to this delegation".
I view the term "in-bailiwick" as no longer suitable for use in careful
