Paul,
On Oct 23, 2022, at 1:27 PM, Paul Hoffman wrote:
>> 1) Ask the stupid question.
> Again? It has already been answered many times in the negative. There are
> even RFCs about it. Asking it again is a waste of people's time.
I’m unaware. Could you point me to the ICANN Board resolution,
On Oct 23, 2022, at 12:00 PM, David Conrad wrote:
> On this mailing list, I think there is a pretty good understanding of the
> intent of .alt and I don’t think there is much in the way of disagreement on
> that intent. As far as I can tell, the points of contention are:
>
> 1) whether the
David Conrad wrote on 2022-10-23 12:00:
Rob,
not rod, but i have three comments.
On this mailing list, I think there is a pretty good understanding of
the intent of .alt and I don’t think there is much in the way of
disagreement on that intent. As far as I can tell, the points of
Rob,
On Oct 22, 2022, at 10:33 AM, Rob Wilton (rwilton) wrote:
> As I read it, the partitioning of the domain name namespace is really to
> achieve two aims:
On this mailing list, I think there is a pretty good understanding of the
intent of .alt and I don’t think there is much in the way of
Suzanne,
On Oct 23, 2022, at 3:50 AM, Suzanne Woolf wrote:
> We've been told repeatedly that no one wants to engage legal analysis or
> liaison communications on a document that doesn't have WG consensus.
This appears broken.
In this specific case, the way forward appears to be predicated on
Hello, Warren
Just uploaded the 12th version. The only change is status of GOST R
34.11-94 -- DEPRECATED.
--
Boris
23.10.2022 18:20, Warren Kumari пишет:
On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 2:54 PM, Warren Kumari wrote:
On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 12:41 PM, Warren Kumari
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations WG of the IETF.
Title : Use of GOST 2012 Signature Algorithms in DNSKEY and
RRSIG Resource Records for DNSSEC
Authors
Martin Schanzenbach wrote on 2022-10-23 04:38:
On 23.10.22 10:50, Suzanne Woolf wrote:
...
The chairs would like to hear it if anyone has anything new to say about such a
registry on its technical merits, including specific registry policy and
operational challenges with administering it
Martin Schanzenbach wrote on 2022-10-23 04:34:
...
Name notion of a "user expectation" for names was thrown around a lot.
Using +alt://example.com or +gns://example.com is
actually making it worse with respect to that aspect than .alt as SUTLD, no?
yes.
It is as if we are chasing a moving
On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 2:54 PM, Warren Kumari wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 12:41 PM, Warren Kumari wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 7:22 AM, Paul Hoffman
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Oct 18, 2022, at 7:58 AM, Ron Even wrote:
>>>
>>> 1. whis is this an informational RFC and not a standard track
On 23.10.22 10:50, Suzanne Woolf wrote:
> Eliot,
>
> On Oct 23, 2022, at 2:15 AM, Eliot Lear mailto:l...@lear.ch>>
> wrote:
>
>
> On 23.10.22 05:40, John Levine wrote:
> It appears that Eliot Lear mailto:l...@lear.ch>> said:
> As a matter of practicality, a registry surely will be form. It
On 21.10.22 18:48, Tim Wicinski wrote:
> >
> >
> > Rather than placing "alt" in the TLD position, I think it might be better
> > as a scheme modifier: https+alt://... This is a common pattern for
> > modifications to URI schemes (c.f. git+ssh://), and informs the software
> > that this URI is
Eliot,
On Oct 23, 2022, at 2:15 AM, Eliot Lear mailto:l...@lear.ch>>
wrote:
On 23.10.22 05:40, John Levine wrote:
It appears that Eliot Lear mailto:l...@lear.ch>> said:
As a matter of practicality, a registry surely will be form. It is
simply a matter of whether the IANA will host it. If
Hi Ben and Wes,
On 21.10.22 20:45, Ben Schwartz wrote:
Rather than placing "alt" in the TLD position, I think it might be
better as a scheme modifier: https+alt://... This is a common
pattern for modifications to URI schemes (c.f. git+ssh://), and
informs the software that this URI is
On 23.10.22 05:40, John Levine wrote:
It appears that Eliot Lear said:
As a matter of practicality, a registry surely will be form. It is
simply a matter of whether the IANA will host it. If the IANA does not
host it, then by shifting it elsewhere this group is actually weakening
the IANA
15 matches
Mail list logo