On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 10:01 AM Viktor Dukhovni
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 08:48:29AM -0400, Shumon Huque wrote:
>
> > So, if a resolver sends EDNS CompactAnswersOK signal to an authority
> > server, which returns a NODATA+NXNAME proof + RCODE=3 response, then the
> > resolver would
On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 10:01 AM Viktor Dukhovni
wrote:
> [ Multi-response to four upthread messages. ]
>
> ---
>
> On Fri, Mar 03, 2023 at 06:23:11PM -0500, Shumon Huque wrote:
>
> > Thanks for your comments. We've posted an updated draft (-01):
> >
> >
>
On 2023-03-28 at 10:14, Mark Andrews wrote:
> Is this JST?
Yes, 13:00 – 14:00 JST.
jakob
___
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
Moin!
On 28 Mar 2023, at 10:14, Mark Andrews wrote:
> Is this JST?
Yes. Currently UTC+9. So it is 04:00 UTC
So long
-Ralf
>
>> On 28 Mar 2023, at 11:15, James Mitchell wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>> The Root Zone Algorithm Rollover Study Design Team is hosting a public
>> session at IETF 116 and
Is this JST?
> On 28 Mar 2023, at 11:15, James Mitchell wrote:
>
> Hello,
> The Root Zone Algorithm Rollover Study Design Team is hosting a public
> session at IETF 116 and invites you to join.
> Date: 29 March, 13:00 – 14:00
> Room: G301
> Remote:
>
On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 3:45 AM Viktor Dukhovni
wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 01, 2023 at 04:27:31PM -0500, Shumon Huque wrote:
> > The cyclic dependency based sibling glue (Section 2.3) is arguably
> > a bit of a corner case, and in past discussions some folks have expressed
> > the view that we
[ Multi-response to four upthread messages. ]
---
On Fri, Mar 03, 2023 at 06:23:11PM -0500, Shumon Huque wrote:
> Thanks for your comments. We've posted an updated draft (-01):
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-huque-dnsop-compact-lies-01
[ Copied from today's
Hello,
The Root Zone Algorithm Rollover Study Design Team is hosting a public session
at IETF 116 and invites you to join.
Date: 29 March, 13:00 – 14:00
Room: G301
Remote:
https://icann.zoom.us/j/94974160556?pwd=eUdOVUFUWi9yZ3FtVVFrbTFJWDFmUT09
On Wed, Mar 01, 2023 at 04:27:31PM -0500, Shumon Huque wrote:
> > These “rare” cases where the domain is not resolvable when a glue is not
> > present are the ones this draft is done for. So did you look how rare
> > they were in your dataset? Being able to resolve instead of not resolving
> >
Hi,
Recursive queries to a pair of matching bind 9.16 servers on openbsd 7.0 are
timing out unexpectedly for only two names: "www.edison.tn.gov" and
"www.tn.gov". Both bind instances are otherwise working fine, and have been for
some time.
The query returns a CNAME, and there's a delegation
On 21. 03. 23 18:05, Wes Hardaker wrote:
Petr Menšík writes:
I have made a proposal to mark all filtered out queries with EDE
code Filtered (17). However codes 15-18 all describe themselves as
per-domain rules.
I agree that none of these look appropriate based on re-reading the text.
11 matches
Mail list logo