Hi John,
On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 02:29, John Levine wrote:
> I think we should adopt it but
Yes, me too.
I have thoughts about the other things you said but it seems better to wait for
that discussion, otherwise we're off the rails in this thread from message 1.
Joe
It appears that Tim Wicinski said:
>-=-=-=-=-=-
>
>Happy Monday (UTC) All,
>
>The chairs heard some strong support to adopt and work on this.
>
>This starts a Call for Adoption for draft-huque-dnsop-compact-lies
>
>The authors did do some updates in the draft around the "lies" moniker.
>Once
Happy Monday (UTC) All,
The chairs heard some strong support to adopt and work on this.
This starts a Call for Adoption for draft-huque-dnsop-compact-lies
The authors did do some updates in the draft around the "lies" moniker.
Once adopted perhaps someone can suggest a better draft name.
The
The DNSOP WG has placed draft-huque-dnsop-compact-lies in state
Call For Adoption By WG Issued (entered by Tim Wicinski)
The document is available at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-huque-dnsop-compact-lies/
___
DNSOP mailing list
