On Thu, Jun 08, 2023 at 11:59:59AM +0200, Benno Overeinder wrote:
> This starts a two week Working Group Last Call process, and ends on:
> June 22nd, 2023.
I hope my feedback is not too late. There are a few important elements
of the draft that could use some changes.
On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at
Looks fine to me.
<>
To the former.
p vixie
On Jun 26, 2023 04:38, Mukund Sivaraman wrote:
Fujiwara-san, Vixie-san,
On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 12:13:02AM -0800, internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote:
>
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
>
On Mon, 2023-06-26 at 07:47 -0700, Peter van Dijk via Datatracker wrote:
> ## 3.2
>
> A previous review
> (https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/sJlbyhro-4bDhfGBnXhhD5Htcew/)
> suggested that the then-chosen tuple was not specific enough, and also said it
> was too prescriptive. I agree
Reviewer: Peter van Dijk
Review result: Almost Ready
I have been selected as the DNS Directorate reviewer for this draft. The
DNS Directorate seeks to review all DNS or DNS-related drafts as
they pass through IETF last call and IESG review, and sometimes on special
request. The purpose of the
Reviewer: Yaron Sheffer
Review result: Has Nits
I am not a DNS expert so these may or may not be real issues. But I would
appreciate the authors' clarifications.
- The error reports are unauthenticated. Some possible implications include:
(1) Operators may choose to implement automated responses
Hi Peter,
Dne 23. 06. 23 v 19:29 Peter Thomassen napsal(a):
On 6/23/23 17:21, libor.peltan wrote:
I would expect the combination of a nameserver not being reachable
and the other party being malicious to be quite a rare event.
A combination of a nameserver being unreachable and an other one
Fujiwara-san, Vixie-san,
On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 12:13:02AM -0800, internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote:
>
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
> This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations WG of the IETF.
>
> Title
PowerDNS Authoritative Server, PowerDNS Recursor, PowerDNS dnsdist:
* IP_PMTUDISC_OMIT with fallback to IP_PMTUDISC_DONT
* default EDNS buffer size of 1232, no probing for smaller sizes
* no handling of EMSGSIZE
* Recursor: UDP timeouts do not cause a switch to TCP. "Spoofing
nearmisses" do.
Dear DNSOP,
This revision of the draft addresses comments received by Wes, Libor, and Tim
(changelog below).
I'm inviting the WG to take another read of the document and share your
concerns.
In particular, please re-raise any concerns you might have voiced at a recent
IETF meeting. Tim has
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
directories. This Internet-Draft is a work item of the Domain Name System
Operations (DNSOP) WG of the IETF.
Title : Consistency for CDS/CDNSKEY and CSYNC is Mandatory
Author : Peter Thomassen
10 matches
Mail list logo
