Paul,
Here is some specific proposed text to address the concern that I raised:
Whereas the priming response is not a referral, and whereas root server
addresses in the priming response are therefore not considered glue records,
RFC 9471 does not apply to the priming response. Root servers are
> On 7 Feb 2024, at 09:57, Brian Dickson wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 12:03 PM Mark Andrews wrote:
> There is nothing to prevent us saying that responses to priming queries
> SHOULD/MUST set TC if all of the addresses of the root servers won’t fit in
> the response or that the roo
On Feb 6, 2024, at 07:17, Florian Obser via Datatracker
wrote:
>
> Reviewer: Florian Obser
> Review result: Ready with Nits
>
> I have been selected as the DNS Directorate reviewer for this draft. The
> DNS Directorate seeks to review all DNS or DNS-related drafts as
> they pass through IETF la
A note to those with opinions about what the root server operators (RSOs)
should do: the draft authors would like the eventual RFC to be accurate, not
aspirational. The RSOs are free to implement and deploy what they want within
their own internal rules that are not covered in this document. Not
On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 12:03 PM Mark Andrews wrote:
> There is nothing to prevent us saying that responses to priming queries
> SHOULD/MUST set TC if all of the addresses of the root servers won’t fit in
> the response or that the root server address should be looked up as if they
> are glue in t
I have submitted -03, which covers the issues you raised in your AD review.
Note that Duane and Mark had more to say on the topic of TC from the roots, but
there was no agreement nor specific text proposed.
--Paul Hoffman
___
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8109bis-03.txt is now available. It is a
work item of the Domain Name System Operations (DNSOP) WG of the IETF.
Title: Initializing a DNS Resolver with Priming Queries
Authors: Peter Koch
Matt Larson
Paul Hoffman
Name:draft-
Greetings. After the DNSOP interim meeting last week, Warren set up a new
mailing list. Its description is:
=
There is a desire to have better methods for parent zones in the DNS to
advertise DNS nameserver capabilities and zone features to resolvers.
This list discusses mechanisms to provi
