On Mon, 18 Feb 2019, Alexander Mayrhofer wrote:
On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 7:47 PM Paul Wouters wrote:
I think this document should be Experimental and not Standards Track?
I was torn when i did the first revision of this. I think it depends
on the stability of Decentralized Identifiers
On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 8:47 PM Melinda Shore
wrote:
> I think the question of whether or not to provide
> decentralized identifiers and whether or not this proposal
> delivers on the "decentralized" claim is out of our hands,
> as the core spec (which has a lot of additional problems)
> comes
Paul,
On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 7:47 PM Paul Wouters wrote:
> I think this document should be Experimental and not Standards Track?
I was torn when i did the first revision of this. I think it depends
on the stability of Decentralized Identifiers themselves. Once that
schema becomes widely used,
On Fri, 15 Feb 2019, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
Subject: Re: [Din] Fwd: New Version Notification for
draft-mayrhofer-did-dns-01.txt
I think this document should be Experimental and not Standards Track?
The reference to 7929 should be normative, not informative, since
you actually need to
On 2/15/19 9:46 AM, Paul Wouters wrote:
> This technically also allows one to separate the two DNS zones more
> clearly (and could even be managed by a different group)
>
> I'm really on the fence for this document. On the one hand, it is good
> to have a memorable decentralized identifier, but
