On Sun, 18 Dec 2016 10:45:57 -0800
william manning wrote:
this became very relevant to DNSOP list again...
> SMTP configuration is not relevant... That said, the morphing of open
> SMTP services to the tightly controlled heirarchy and draconian
> locally administered rules which prevent delivery
SMTP configuration is not relevant... That said, the morphing of open SMTP
services to the tightly controlled heirarchy and draconian locally
administered rules which prevent delivery are EXACTLY what this draft
proposes for the DNS.
On Sunday, 18 December 2016, Tim Wicinski wrote:
> Jim is corr
Jim is correct, this is not relevant
tim
On 12/18/16 7:37 AM, Jim Reid wrote:
On 18 Dec 2016, at 12:28, sth...@nethelp.no wrote:
You're saying that most spam messages contain a Message-ID header.
Please take this discussion somewhere else. It is not appropriate for dnsop.
___
> On 18 Dec 2016, at 12:28, sth...@nethelp.no wrote:
>
> You're saying that most spam messages contain a Message-ID header.
Please take this discussion somewhere else. It is not appropriate for dnsop.
___
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.
> Regarding "Message-ID header" - factually, over 80% of all spam
> (I have not bothered to do the actual number check, it is probably closer
> to 99.99% but I am erring on the side of caution - as this is science
> and not opinion, it is what it is)
>
> - All contain a Message-ID header.
You
On Sun, 18 Dec 2016 07:59:30 GMT
Vernon Schryver wrote:
> > From: ac
> > To: dnsop@ietf.org
> > If any of you are thinking about speaking your mind, there are
> > consequences.
> What consequences are those, besides subjecting me to two instead of
> only one copy of a message that doesn't seem to
> From: ac
> To: dnsop@ietf.org
> If any of you are thinking about speaking your mind, there are consequences.
What consequences are those, besides subjecting me to two instead of
only one copy of a message that doesn't seem to contain improved words
for the RPZ draft?
> v...@rhyolite.com
> ho
If any of you are thinking about speaking your mind, there are consequences.
v...@rhyolite.com
host smtp.rhyolite.com [192.188.61.3]
SMTP error from remote mail server after end of data:
550 5.7.1 mail uBI4vMnA039102 from 188.40.114.80 rejected by DCC
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distributed_Che
