Hi,
On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 10:04:38AM +1000, Mark Andrews wrote:
> I think the issue is that NAT64 is being used to reach internal IPv4 addresses
> (e.g. RFC 1918) so the traffic needs to go through a NAT64 that can reach
> those
> addresses.
If you do that (which is a nice way to leverage
;
> Cheers,
> Med
>
>> -Message d'origine-
>> De : Gert Doering
>> Envoyé : lundi 10 juillet 2023 08:53
>> À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET
>> Cc : Ted Lemon ; v6...@ietf.org; Xipengxiao
>> ; dnsop
>> Objet : Re: [v6ops] DNS64/Thread RE: [DNS
Hi Gert,
Please see inline.
Cheers,
Med
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Gert Doering
> Envoyé : lundi 10 juillet 2023 08:53
> À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET
> Cc : Ted Lemon ; v6...@ietf.org; Xipengxiao
> ; dnsop
> Objet : Re: [v6ops] DNS64/Thread RE: [DNSOP]
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 07, 2023 at 01:19:38PM +, mohamed.boucad...@orange.com wrote:
> For your last point: problems may arise if a distinct pref64 is used by the
> upstream DNS64 than the one used locally. Unless I???m mistaken, we currently
> don???t have a solution to detect mismatches between
