A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations Working Group of
the IETF.
Title : DNSSEC Operational Practices, Version 2
Author(s) : Olaf M. Kolkman
Hi Joseph,
since I am not sure if you understood my point (I am not sure if I was able
to understand it myself :), I am summarizing it to the mailing list.
I like the direction of your work, but I miss a way how to put more stuff under
the named prefix.
I would like you to update RFC2317
On 30 Mar 2012, at 12:09, Ondřej Surý wrote:
Hi Joseph,
since I am not sure if you understood my point (I am not sure if I was able
to understand it myself :), I am summarizing it to the mailing list.
I like the direction of your work, but I miss a way how to put more stuff
under
the
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 10:19:43AM +, Ray Bellis wrote:
On 30 Mar 2012, at 12:09, Ond??ej Surý wrote:
Hi Joseph,
since I am not sure if you understood my point (I am not sure if I was able
to understand it myself :), I am summarizing it to the mailing list.
I like the
On 3/30/2012 10:19 AM, Ray Bellis wrote:
With the current scheme it's possible to delegate longer prefixes, and this
is a necessary feature.
The stuff Dan was saying about two alternate representations concerns me,
though. As written, by default:
192.168.64/18 is 1.0.m.168.192
but
