[DNSOP] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf-fix-04

2018-09-24 Thread Francesca Palombini
Reviewer: Francesca Palombini Review result: Ready with Nits I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments.

Re: [DNSOP] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf-fix-04

2018-09-24 Thread Dave Crocker
Hi. Thanks for the detailed comments. Some responses... On 9/24/2018 3:00 AM, Francesca Palombini wrote: The use of underscored node names is specific to each RRTYPE that is being scoped. As an non-expert in the area, I would have appreciate a ref to a document introducing RRTYPE.

[DNSOP] DNSSEC validation

2018-09-24 Thread Djibril ROBLE
Hi, I am an administrator of DNS resolvers to Djibouti Telecom. I updated the root key to our DNS resolvers servers. Is there a way to tell if DNSSEC is using the last trusted anchor ( Update on the Root KSK Rollover Project) ? # dig @127.0.0.1 dnssec-failed.org a +dnssec Link:

Re: [DNSOP] [v6ops] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-v6ops-xie-network-happyeyeballs-00.txt

2018-09-24 Thread 神明達哉
At Fri, 21 Sep 2018 14:31:50 +0800, Davey Song wrote: > I just submited a new draft intending to provide better connectivity from > network side function . Comments are welcome. Some quick observations: - I don't see why the intended status is Standards Track. It seems to be a document

Re: [DNSOP] [v6ops] New Version Notification for draft-v6ops-xie-network-happyeyeballs-00.txt

2018-09-24 Thread Fred Baker
> On Sep 24, 2018, at 11:14 AM, 神明達哉 wrote: > > At Fri, 21 Sep 2018 14:31:50 +0800, > Davey Song wrote: > > > I just submited a new draft intending to provide better connectivity from > > network side function . Comments are welcome. > > Some quick observations: > > - I don't see why the

Re: [DNSOP] [v6ops] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-v6ops-xie-network-happyeyeballs-00.txt

2018-09-24 Thread Davey Song
Hi Jinmei, Thanks for your comments. I once had same questions in my mind when this draft is conceived. I reply inline. Some quick observations: > > - I don't see why the intended status is Standards Track. It seems to > be a document about an operational practice rather than a new >