> On Oct 1, 2007, at 7:42 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> >
> >> As for the TSIG or SIG(0) recommendation, I'm not sure what
> >> the numbers are for client support today, but I suspect it's at
> >> best an negligible sample.
> >
> > Well all Windows XP/2003/Vista boxes can be configured to
> >
On Oct 1, 2007, at 7:42 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
As for the TSIG or SIG(0) recommendation, I'm not sure what
the numbers are for client support today, but I suspect it's at
best an negligible sample.
Well all Windows XP/2003/Vista boxes can be configured to
support TSIG, with
> As for the TSIG or SIG(0) recommendation, I'm not sure what
> the numbers are for client support today, but I suspect it's at
> best an negligible sample.
Well all Windows XP/2003/Vista boxes can be configured to
support TSIG, with free software, if not natively.
All Li
On Oct 1, 2007, at 1:08 PM, John Kristoff wrote:
Since this group can be a bit pedantic about terminology, what Danny
is referencing is what I was specifically referring to as "resolvers".
I totally made up those four categories for my purposes of describing
some of the work we were doing as a
On Mon, 1 Oct 2007 10:47:44 -0600
Danny McPherson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Perhaps expanding in the "Problem Description" section
> would be beneficial. Something mentioning that Many
> SOHO and broadband access devices provide some flavor
> of name resolution services (e.g., there are 4 flav
On Oct 1, 2007, at 1:52 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
On Sun, Sep 30, 2007 at 10:32:39PM -0600,
Danny McPherson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
a message of 51 lines which said:
Section 4's reference to BCP 84, in part, creates a false sense of
useful action on part of the operator,
This could
On Sun, Sep 30, 2007 at 10:32:39PM -0600,
Danny McPherson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
a message of 51 lines which said:
> Section 4's reference to BCP 84, in part, creates a false sense of
> useful action on part of the operator,
This could be said of all the parts of the I-D which mentions non-
