* Ralf Weber:
> But isn't priming only done at startup? And how often do people start
> there nameservers? This could be the cause.
I think BIND will almost inevitably learn a more authoritative version
of the l.root-servers.net/IN/A RRSET over time, which will be used for
queries.
_
> Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> > It's been done. IT DOES NOT WORK. named has code to prevent
> > the records being added because IT DOES NOT WORK and we got
> > sick and tired of telling people who ran up against sites
> > that did it that IT DOES NOT WORK. It's better to prevent th
Mark Andrews wrote:
It's been done. IT DOES NOT WORK. named has code to prevent
the records being added because IT DOES NOT WORK and we got
sick and tired of telling people who ran up against sites
that did it that IT DOES NOT WORK. It's better to prevent than
> ... I have found some servers that do *. NS - or so i'm told by their
> support tech community. But not BIND. BIND should be flexible and allow
> that.
bind is following the spec.
___
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/
At 11:40 -0500 12/5/07, Joe Baptista wrote:
experiment. I have found some servers that do *. NS - or so i'm told...
ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc4592.txt
See sections 4.2 and 4.2.1. for comments on this idea.
--
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
> This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
> --070503020104070709050909
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
> Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> >>Actually no. That is not correct. I did some experimentation using
> >>BIND 8 a
Mark Andrews wrote:
Actually no. That is not correct. I did some experimentation using
BIND 8 and 9 as root servers. BIND 8 does not support
*. CNAME some.host.name.
Actually all versions of BIND support "* CNAME".
Sorry - your right - its DNAME it does not do.
But
> This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
> --020009050009010201030606
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
> Paul Vixie wrote:
>
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joe Baptista) writes:
> >
> >
> >
> >>No it can't be done with B
> This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
> --080203070704010404050306
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
> Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
>
> >On Wed, Dec 05, 2007 at 02:28:53AM +0100,
> > Mohsen Souissi <[EMAIL PROTECT
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joe Baptista) writes:
>
> > No it can't be done with BIND. Very lame. It would be a big asset to
> > root technology of the entire "*." wildcard TLD label could be pointed
> > to AS112. AS112 is truly the blackhole of this universe we call the
> > internet. AS112 - the
Paul Vixie wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joe Baptista) writes:
No it can't be done with BIND. Very lame. It would be a big asset to
root technology of the entire "*." wildcard TLD label could be pointed
to AS112. AS112 is truly the blackhole of this universe we call the
internet. AS112 -
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joe Baptista) writes:
> No it can't be done with BIND. Very lame. It would be a big asset to
> root technology of the entire "*." wildcard TLD label could be pointed
> to AS112. AS112 is truly the blackhole of this universe we call the
> internet. AS112 - the internet gar
Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
On Wed, Dec 05, 2007 at 02:28:53AM +0100,
Mohsen Souissi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
a message of 25 lines which said:
OK for the first querie, but as the referal to AS112 NS's will lead
to a lame delegation
If the AS112 servers' configuration is not modifi
On Tue, 4 Dec 2007, Edward Lewis wrote:
>
> Note that the RFC's text says "implementation" and not "application" or
> "protocol." There isn't a standard DNS algorithm for choosing the server to
> be queried, the algorithms are up to the implementers (as the algorithm isn't
> an inter-operability i
On Wed, Dec 05, 2007 at 02:28:53AM +0100,
Mohsen Souissi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
a message of 25 lines which said:
> OK for the first querie, but as the referal to AS112 NS's will lead
> to a lame delegation
If the AS112 servers' configuration is not modified. But if they have
some sort of w
15 matches
Mail list logo
