At 7:55 +1100 4/1/08, Mark Andrews wrote:
Multiple PTR records scale worse than multiple A records.
That sentence is hard to parse.
I looked at the draft again and this thread.
The issue is not clear. Yes, you can have multiple PTR records.
Yes, there is a limit on how many records of
Edward Lewis wrote:
At 12:57 -0800 12/3/07, Brian Dickson wrote:
What are the pros/cons of this, other than the obvious offloading
of junk TLD lookups?
From http://www.nanog.org/mtg-0310/pdf/wessels.pdf:
See (unnumbered) slide Punchline from Last Year's Talk:
Category
At 10:35 -0700 4/1/08, Sebastian Castro Avila wrote:
Sorry for the late response. About this matter, using the data collected
at the root server instances participating in DITL 2007, we found 24.73%
of the queries seen at the roots were for invalid TLD's.
Doing an analysis per root, the numbers
On Tue, 1 Apr 2008, Sebastian Castro wrote:
So the data seems to be useful (but not complete). Once we got all the
data for DITL 2008 we could try to run the same test and look for
trends.
But it is a good start in having a look at the problem (or if anyone could
consider to be a problem).
Dear colleagues,
On Tue, Apr 01, 2008 at 10:36:28AM -0400, Edward Lewis wrote:
Multiple PTR records can be stored in a single PTR RRset. If a
device at an IP address (v4 or v6) has multiple identities with
domain names, it would be good to have a PTR for each. However, this
is not
On Apr 1, 2008, at 2:36 PM, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
I'm inclined to add this text. I'd like additional expressions of
support (or edits, or whatever) from the WG to confirm my inclination.
I agree that it's worth mentioning.
___
DNSOP mailing list
