Re: [DNSOP] (no subject)

2014-04-12 Thread Patrik Fältström
On 11 apr 2014, at 23:12, Warren Kumari war...@kumari.net wrote: Hi there all, At the moment this document says that the child SHOULD remove the CDS/CDNSKEY record once the parent has consumed / acted on it (this behavior was requested by someone -- unfortunately I cannot remember whom).

Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-delegation-trust-maintainance - should child remove the CDS RR?

2014-04-12 Thread Patrik Fältström
No, I want B. That CDS and CDNSKEY is staying in the zone. Patrik On 12 apr 2014, at 00:11, Warren Kumari war...@kumari.net wrote: [ Apologies all - I initially sent this with no subject line. Resending. Hopefully this makes things clearer... Also, unless we hear strong objections I'm

Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-delegation-trust-maintainance - should child remove the CDS RR?

2014-04-12 Thread Warren Kumari
On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 3:28 AM, Patrik Fältström p...@frobbit.se wrote: No, I want B. That CDS and CDNSKEY is staying in the zone. Doh! Yes. Sorry, when I resent this with the subject added I forgot which order I'd listed the two options - I'd though A was B and B was A. Unless we hear

Re: [DNSOP] draft new charter: add stub resolvers?

2014-04-12 Thread Tim Wicinski
On 4/8/14, 7:38 AM, Petr Spacek wrote: On 4.4.2014 00:42, Paul Hoffman wrote: On Apr 3, 2014, at 2:50 PM, Andrew Sullivana...@anvilwalrusden.com wrote: On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 05:39:58PM -0400, Suzanne Woolf wrote: operated on Internet networks. This will include root zone name

Re: [DNSOP] Supporting with changes was Re: ... draft-ietf-dnsop-delegation-trust-maintainance

2014-04-12 Thread Suzanne Woolf
On Apr 11, 2014, at 12:08 PM, Edward Lewis edlewis.subscri...@cox.net wrote: On Apr 11, 2014, at 11:24, Paul Hoffman paul.hoff...@vpnc.org wrote: So far, no one has said publish as is, have they? Considering the last call was for a specific version of a specific document[0], I interpret