On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 07:22:47AM -0800, Paul Hoffman wrote:
Proposal: comments not be allowed in the canonical format. This will allow
more likely interoperability.
Ick. Also, the comment character is specified in RFC 1035. If you're
not doing that specification correctly, I suggest,
On 22 feb 2015, at 20:58, Paul Hoffman paul.hoff...@vpnc.org wrote:
As for Måns original question: converting wire-format IDNA to some encoding
of Unicode characters is unstable because some registries use IDNA2003 rules,
others use IDNA2008 rules, and some labels in the former can't be
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations Working Group
of the IETF.
Title : Domain Name System (DNS) Cookies
Authors : Donald E. Eastlake
