> On 22 feb 2015, at 20:58, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoff...@vpnc.org> wrote: > > As for Måns original question: converting wire-format IDNA to some encoding > of Unicode characters is unstable because some registries use IDNA2003 rules, > others use IDNA2008 rules, and some labels in the former can't be represented > in the latter. Yes, IDNA2008 obsoleted IDNA2003; that is irrelevant to the a > good chunk of the operator community.
It is correct that the policy for what Unicode Characters are allowed have changed over time (even for IDNA2008 it changes when the Unicode version changes). But the _encoding_ of the characters is the same. So maybe some of the "maybe disagreements" are not disagreements after all? paf
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
