Hi all,
This revision https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-reddy-dnsop-error-page-05
updates security considerations section to address comments from the WG
during the presentation at IETF-108.
As a reminder, it discusses a method to return an URL that explains the
reason the DNS query was
This starts a Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dnsop-iana-class-type-yang.
Current versions of the draft are available here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-iana-class-type-yang/
The Current Intended Status of this document is: Standards Track
Benno Overeinder will be
A few questions and suggestions:
Section 3, algorithm step 5: what is a "hidden QTYPE"?
Also step 5, a NOERROR answer can be positive or negative, so I think it
should be made clear that this is about a non-NXDOMAIN negative cache
entry. (RFC 2308 calls these "NODATA".)
Step 6, what is the
Hi Duane!
> -Original Message-
> From: iesg On Behalf Of Wessels, Duane
> Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2020 8:28 AM
> To: Roman Danyliw
> Cc: draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-zone-dig...@ietf.org; Tim Wicinski
> ; dnsop-cha...@ietf.org; dnsop@ietf.org; Wessels, Duane
> ; The IESG
> Subject: Re:
> On Oct 12, 2020, at 8:56 AM, Rob Wilton (rwilton)
> wrote:
>
>
>
>>
>>>
>>> 2. The ZONEMD Resource Record
>>>
>>> It is
>>> RECOMMENDED that a zone include only one ZONEMD RR, unless the
>> zone
>>> publisher is in the process of transitioning to a new Scheme or
>>
> On Oct 12, 2020, at 9:24 AM, Roman Danyliw wrote:
>
> Hi Duane!
>
> Thanks for the extensive changes in -13. They address my concerns. I have
> left one remaining comment about clarifying "provably secure" with a
> reference. Otherwise, I've cleared my ballot.
Thanks Roman,
Instead
On 9 Oct 2020, at 11:58, Roy Arends wrote:
> On 9 Oct 2020, at 10:38, Andrew McConachie wrote:
Hi Roy and Joe,
It’s not clear to me whether the document is advising to only use
this facility when a sub-domain of a public domain name is
unavailable, or to optionally use this facility
