Re: [DNSOP] Please review in terminology-bis: Global DNS and Private DNS

2018-01-15 Thread Andrew Sullivan
Hi, On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 02:52:11PM +0100, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > I think that it would be better to remove "global DNS". It is not a > technical definition and it assumes things like the mythical "names > operational community". I don't believe the "names operational community" is

Re: [DNSOP] Please review in terminology-bis: Global DNS and Private DNS

2017-12-21 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 09:29:58AM -0500, Ted Lemon wrote a message of 176 lines which said: > Now that I've attempted to compose this reply, it seems to me, and > perhaps was obvious to other readers more quickly because they're at > 20kft and not 1ft on this, that your

Re: [DNSOP] Please review in terminology-bis: Global DNS and Private DNS

2017-12-18 Thread Ted Lemon
On Dec 18, 2017, at 8:52 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > I think that it would be better to remove "global DNS". It is not a > technical definition and it assumes things like the mythical "names > operational community". This draft is about DNS terminology. From the > point of

Re: [DNSOP] Please review in terminology-bis: Global DNS and Private DNS

2017-12-18 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 10:28:04AM -0800, Paul Hoffman wrote a message of 14 lines which said: > Section 2 has definitions of "Global DNS" and "Private DNS", based > on the facets listed in "Naming system". This was discussed heavily > on the list earlier, but it is