>
> Note that my original point was that if the current RBL lives at
> antispam.rbl-vendor.org, simply moving it to _antispam.rbl-vendor.org
> might fix it if the underscore handling mentioned in the minimized query
> RFC is actually implemented with some code in the current implementations,
> in
On Sat, 11 Nov 2023, John R Levine wrote:
work(ed) fine without minimization and I don't think it is reasonable
to expect every mail system in the world to change their configuration
to work around our performance bug.
It is totally reasonable for protocols and software and configurations
On Sat, 11 Nov 2023, Paul Wouters wrote:
DNSBLs have been around a lot longer than QNAME minimization. They
work(ed) fine without minimization and I don't think it is reasonable
to expect every mail system in the world to change their configuration
to work around our performance bug.
It is
On Fri, 10 Nov 2023, David Conrad wrote:
DNSBLs have been around a lot longer than QNAME minimization.
Not sure that’s relevant — I presume you’re not suggesting DNSBLs are a
predominant use of the DNS.
In the overall Internet, no, but within the e-mail world it's probably the
majority of
