Re: [DNSOP] RFC4641bis Section 4.4.5 proposed new text

2009-05-26 Thread Florian Weimer
* Antoin Verschuren: There are multiple reasons why a registrant may want to change it's its? their? changed so such rollover scenario will not work. Besides if zone transfers are not allowed by the losing DNS operator and NSEC3 is deployed in the zone then the gaining DNS

[DNSOP] RFC4641bis Section 4.4.5 proposed new text

2009-05-20 Thread Antoin Verschuren
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi All, I have drafted some new proposed text for section 4.4.5 of RFC4641bis. I tried to bring some more structure to the section while maintaining most of the text from the current iteration of the document. It now clearly separates: -

Re: [DNSOP] RFC4641bis Section 4.4.5 proposed new text

2009-05-20 Thread Scott Rose
Antoin Verschuren wrote: Hi All, I have drafted some new proposed text for section 4.4.5 of RFC4641bis. I tried to bring some more structure to the section while maintaining most of the text from the current iteration of the document. It now clearly separates: -Definition of terms