Re: [DNSOP] Updates to AS 112 WG drafts -- solicitation for progress

2009-03-12 Thread Alfred Hönes
Hello all, First, my thanks to William F. Maton Sotomayor for taking up this long-lasting thread and reviving the AS112 drafts. I have followed up to both new AS112 drafts, draft-ietf-dnsop-as112-ops-02 and draft-ietf-dnsop-as112-under-attack-help-help-02, and I heartly recommend

Re: [DNSOP] Updates to AS 112 WG drafts

2009-03-12 Thread Chris Thompson
Another (sorry!) nit in draft-ietf-dnsop-as112-ops-02: There are inconsistencies in which of these two URLs is the preferred one to be put in the informational TXT records: http://as112.net/ http://www.as112.net/ In fact, as the DNS is at the moment, the first works only by virtue of

[DNSOP] Updates to AS 112 WG drafts

2009-03-10 Thread William F. Maton Sotomayor
All, After somewhat of a longer hiatus on Peter's part (the WG last call on one document seems to have drifted by and then dropped) and my part (largely to do with increased workload), I have finally put together new versions of each draft. The proceeding is based on some correspondence