On 21.2.2018 21:42, Edward Lewis wrote:
> On 2/21/18, 14:59, "DNSOP on behalf of Wessels, Duane"
> wrote:
>
>
>>> On Feb 21, 2018, at 2:53 PM, Joe Abley wrote:
>>>
>>> Why did 8145 specify hex? I
I was not aware of this Linux library, to resolve localhost, and a few others:
https://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/man/nss-myhostname.html
___
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
On 22-02-18 10:03, Petr Špaček wrote:
> I would prefer decimal for user-friendliness, and zero padding to make
> implementation easier and faster.
+1, decimal and zero padded to 5 digits to make it fixed length labels.
-- Ralph
___
DNSOP mailing list
Hi Petr,
> On Feb 22, 2018, at 04:03, Petr Špaček wrote:
>
> I would prefer decimal for user-friendliness, and zero padding to make
> implementation easier and faster.
A few people now have mentioned that they like zero padding. What is
it about zero padding or fixed-size
On 22.2.2018 11:38, Joe Abley wrote:
> Hi Petr,
>
>> On Feb 22, 2018, at 04:03, Petr Špaček wrote:
>>
>> I would prefer decimal for user-friendliness, and zero padding to make
>> implementation easier and faster.
>
> A few people now have mentioned that they like zero
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations WG of the IETF.
Title : C-DNS: A DNS Packet Capture Format
Authors : John Dickinson
Jim Hague
Hi Folks,
We have an update to draft which we hope captures all the comments to-date.
- Make all data items in Q/R, QuerySignature and Malformed Message arrays
optional
- Re-structure the FilePreamble and ConfigurationParameters into BlockParameters
- BlockParameters has separate Storage and
On 22 Feb 2018, at 06:20, Petr Špaček wrote:
> On 22.2.2018 11:38, Joe Abley wrote:
>
>> A few people now have mentioned that they like zero padding. What is
>> it about zero padding or fixed-size labels that makes implementation
>> easier than specifying no zero padding?
>