On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 8:34 AM Shumon Huque wrote:
> On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 4:49 AM Stephane Bortzmeyer
> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, May 04, 2020 at 03:08:20PM -0400,
>> Tim Wicinski wrote
>> a message of 64 lines which said:
>>
>> > This starts a Call for Adoption for
>> >
On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 4:49 AM Stephane Bortzmeyer
wrote:
> On Mon, May 04, 2020 at 03:08:20PM -0400,
> Tim Wicinski wrote
> a message of 64 lines which said:
>
> > This starts a Call for Adoption for
> > draft-mglt-dnsop-dnssec-validator-requirements
>
> I think it is important to have such
On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 8:34 AM Shumon Huque wrote:
> On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 4:49 AM Stephane Bortzmeyer
> wrote:
>
> The draft apparently do not mention advices on expiration slack (such
>> as val-sig-skew-min and val-sig-skew-max in Unbound). Is there a
>> consensus on (I quote Unbound
On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 12:10 PM Tim Wicinski wrote:
>
>
> All,
>
> As we stated in the meeting and in our chairs actions, we're going to run
> regular call for adoptions over next few months.
> We are looking for *explicit* support for adoption.
>
>
> This starts a Call for Adoption for
>
On 02/05/2020 09:09, Roy Arends wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Ed and I just submitted a new version of our private-use TLD draft.
>
> https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-arends-private-use-tld-01.txt
While I do not have hard facts but just a gut feeling, I would feel
safer if "xn" is excluded from the possible
Thanks for the feed back Shumon,
I agree that we should at least clarify where the responsibilities are so
the mechanisms become more focused on smoothing the edges rather that
compensating what the other party may not do.
I also agree that fixed values might be more appropriated and the RDO
Hi Joe,
Thanks for putting the reference of that draft. I have always thought that
the draft you were mentioning was the one that became RFC7958. The current
draft mentions that TA should be associated with bootstrapping mechanism
and that boostrapping for the root zone should be extended to
Hi Daniel,
On 7 May 2020, at 15:39, Daniel Migault wrote:
> Thanks for putting the reference of that draft. I have always thought that
> the draft you were mentioning was the one that became RFC7958.
7958 came from draft-jabley-dnssec-trust-anchor, but the confusion is entirely
reasonable!
On 4 May 2020, at 15:08, Tim Wicinski wrote:
> This starts a Call for Adoption for
> draft-mglt-dnsop-dnssec-validator-requirements
>
> The draft is available here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mglt-dnsop-dnssec-validator-requirements/
>
>
> Please review this draft to see if
(Apologies to folks who may have already seen this announcement on other
lists)
Hi all,
OARC is hosting an online meeting on June 9th, 17:00-19:00 UTC. The
Programme Committee are seeking contributions from the community.
All DNS-related subjects are welcome, but we're particularly interested
Daniel
Thanks for taking Joe's draft under advice and I agree there is work to be
collaborated on.
Tim
(speaking as a chair)
On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 3:42 PM Joe Abley wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> On 7 May 2020, at 15:39, Daniel Migault wrote:
>
> > Thanks for putting the reference of that draft. I
11 matches
Mail list logo
