On Tue, Oct 01, 2019 at 04:36:02PM -0700, Wes Hardaker wrote:
> > I appears that text discussing the possibility of multiple EDE values
> > present in earlier drafts may have been inadvertently removed in -07.
> > I think such text should be restored, making it clear that the OPT
> > record may
Viktor Dukhovni writes:
> > On Sep 30, 2019, at 7:06 PM, Wes Hardaker wrote:
> >
> >> Which raises another question: Can an OPT RR legitimately carry more
> >> than one EDE option, and thereby communicate multiple errors? Such as
> >> perhaps the above hypothetical with some RRSIGs expired,
> On Sep 30, 2019, at 7:06 PM, Wes Hardaker wrote:
>
>> Which raises another question: Can an OPT RR legitimately carry more
>> than one EDE option, and thereby communicate multiple errors? Such as
>> perhaps the above hypothetical with some RRSIGs expired, and some not
>> yet vlid.
>
> Yes,
Viktor Dukhovni writes:
> ... but no signatures are presently valid and some (often all)
> are expired.
> ... but no signatures are presently valid and some are not yet valid.
Ok, changed to that text.
> Which raises another question: Can an OPT RR legitimately carry more
> than
> On Sep 27, 2019, at 7:32 PM, internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote:
>
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-dnsop-extended-error-10
Perhaps at my instigation the descriptions for:
3.8. Extended DNS Error Code 7 - Signature Expired
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations WG of the IETF.
Title : Extended DNS Errors
Authors : Warren Kumari
Evan Hunt
