Re: Review of first 3 chapters of Writer Guide
F Campos Costero wrote: Keith, I'm sorry to hear you were sick. I hope you are fully better. All of my commits for the Writer Guide have already been pushed to the repo. On future chapters, I will inspect any tracked changes that are present when I get the document but I will accept or reject them before I push the new version back to the repo. I think having every change viewed by one other person is enough and I'd like to avoid having large numbers of changes in a document. I'm also ready to push Czeslaw's changes to the Getting Started guide if you are ok with me replacing the files in the Review folder. I posted a question in Czeslaw's thread about that. Regards, Francis On Wed, Feb 8, 2023 at 1:47 PM Keith N. McKenna wrote: Francis; Ideally You should go through the changes one, by one anseither accept them or reject them. However, there is a bug that makes that difficult if there are more than 4 or 5 changes. I will try to track that bug down and raise its priority to hopefully get it fixed. I see no reason given the known bug of accepting the changes and then making any new changes as necessary. Regards Keith F Campos Costero wrote: I finished my review of the first three chapters of the Writer Guide. After I pushed the commits, it occurred to me that I probably should have accepted all of Keith's edits that were in place when I fetched the documents. Does anyone object to a standard process of accepting all previous Tracked Changes and making new commits only with new edits or revisions of the previous ones? I have found that having a large number of tracked changes makes documents unwieldy and even unstable. Regards, Francis On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 6:09 PM F Campos Costero wrote: Keith, Sorry, I got myself confused. I incorporated Czeslaw's changes into the Getting Started Guide chapters 2 and 3 and did another pass through those chapters. I am just starting the review of the Writer guide. My comments above about folder structure apply to the Getting Started Guide but they will apply to the Writer Guide soon. Francis On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 12:38 PM F Campos Costero < fjcc.apa...@gmail.com> wrote: Keith, I just assigned the reviews of chapters 2 and 3 to myself. These are both done, actually, as I worked on them over the weekend. I took the version of the two chapters from the ForWiki folder, edited them (Czeslaw's changes plus a few minor changes of my own) and saved them in the Review folder. This was all done on my local computer. The local Review folder now contains my new versions of chapters 2 and 3 plus the previously existing review versions of all the other chapters. How do you want to handle those older "review" versions? Should I delete them, since they are, I suppose, superseded by the files in the ForWiki folder? There are also copies of all the chapters in the folder one level up from the ForWiki and Review folders. They seem to be, at the moment, duplicates of the versions in ForWiki. Do we need those? I would think that we need, at most, two copies of the files, one representing what is on the wiki and another that is the working copy. We could just have a single visible version and just be diligent about tagging the versions that get posted to the wiki, but I'm fine with whatever people are comfortable with. Three copies, though, seems like more than is necessary. Regards, Francis On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 10:47 AM Keith N. McKenna < keith.mcke...@comcast.net> wrote: Francis; I had a conversation with infra today as I was not able to assign you either. What you have to do is go ti http://gitbox.apache.org/ and link your ASF id there. Than you should be able to assign yourself, or I can assign you. In issues only committers or those with the triage privilege can be assigned to issues. Please let me know how it works out. Regards Keith F Campos Costero wrote: Hi Keith, I was going to assign myself to issue 95, the review of chapter 2, but I do not see any way to do that. Do I need to be granted some authority or am I not seeing something obvious? My github user id is FJCC. Francis On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 1:06 PM Keith N. McKenna < keith.mcke...@comcast.net> wrote: Thanks Francis Keith F Campos Costero wrote: Keith I hope I can start to review the documents before the end of next week. I have another thing I have to work on for a few more days. Once I'm free, I'll pick an issue. Francis On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 1:32 PM Keith N. McKenna < keith.mcke...@comcast.net> wrote: A second review of Chapters 1-3 of the Writer Guide are needed. Please Assign yourself to the GitHub issues and review. Francis if you cannot assign yourself, let me know which you will do and gn you.and I will assi Thanks Keith - To unsubscribe, e-mail: doc-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail:
Re: Review of first 3 chapters of Writer Guide
Keith, I'm sorry to hear you were sick. I hope you are fully better. All of my commits for the Writer Guide have already been pushed to the repo. On future chapters, I will inspect any tracked changes that are present when I get the document but I will accept or reject them before I push the new version back to the repo. I think having every change viewed by one other person is enough and I'd like to avoid having large numbers of changes in a document. I'm also ready to push Czeslaw's changes to the Getting Started guide if you are ok with me replacing the files in the Review folder. I posted a question in Czeslaw's thread about that. Regards, Francis On Wed, Feb 8, 2023 at 1:47 PM Keith N. McKenna wrote: > Francis; > > Ideally You should go through the changes one, by one anseither accept > them or reject them. However, there is a bug that makes that difficult > if there are more than 4 or 5 changes. I will try to track that bug down > and raise its priority to hopefully get it fixed. > > I see no reason given the known bug of accepting the changes and then > making any new changes as necessary. > > Regards > Keith > > > F Campos Costero wrote: > > I finished my review of the first three chapters of the Writer Guide. > After > > I pushed the commits, it occurred to me that I probably should have > > accepted all of Keith's edits that were in place when I fetched the > > documents. Does anyone object to a standard process of accepting all > > previous Tracked Changes and making new commits only with new edits or > > revisions of the previous ones? I have found that having a large number > of > > tracked changes makes documents unwieldy and even unstable. > > > > Regards, > > Francis > > > > On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 6:09 PM F Campos Costero > > wrote: > > > >> Keith, > >> Sorry, I got myself confused. I incorporated Czeslaw's changes into the > >> Getting Started Guide chapters 2 and 3 and did another pass through > those > >> chapters. I am just starting the review of the Writer guide. My comments > >> above about folder structure apply to the Getting Started Guide but they > >> will apply to the Writer Guide soon. > >> > >> Francis > >> > >> On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 12:38 PM F Campos Costero < > fjcc.apa...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> Keith, > >>> I just assigned the reviews of chapters 2 and 3 to myself. These are > both > >>> done, actually, as I worked on them over the weekend. I took the > version of > >>> the two chapters from the ForWiki folder, edited them (Czeslaw's > changes > >>> plus a few minor changes of my own) and saved them in the Review > folder. > >>> This was all done on my local computer. The local Review folder now > >>> contains my new versions of chapters 2 and 3 plus the previously > existing > >>> review versions of all the other chapters. How do you want to handle > those > >>> older "review" versions? Should I delete them, since they are, I > suppose, > >>> superseded by the files in the ForWiki folder? > >>> There are also copies of all the chapters in the folder one level up > from > >>> the ForWiki and Review folders. They seem to be, at the moment, > duplicates > >>> of the versions in ForWiki. Do we need those? I would think that we > need, > >>> at most, two copies of the files, one representing what is on the wiki > and > >>> another that is the working copy. We could just have a single visible > >>> version and just be diligent about tagging the versions that get > posted to > >>> the wiki, but I'm fine with whatever people are comfortable with. Three > >>> copies, though, seems like more than is necessary. > >>> Regards, > >>> Francis > >>> > >>> On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 10:47 AM Keith N. McKenna < > >>> keith.mcke...@comcast.net> wrote: > >>> > Francis; > > I had a conversation with infra today as I was not able to assign you > either. What you have to do is go ti http://gitbox.apache.org/ and > link > your ASF id there. Than you should be able to assign yourself, or I > can > assign you. In issues only committers or those with the triage > privilege > can be assigned to issues. > > Please let me know how it works out. > > Regards > Keith > > > F Campos Costero wrote: > > Hi Keith, > > I was going to assign myself to issue 95, the review of chapter 2, > but > I do > > not see any way to do that. Do I need to be granted some authority or > am I > > not seeing something obvious? My github user id is FJCC. > > > > Francis > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 1:06 PM Keith N. McKenna < > keith.mcke...@comcast.net> > > wrote: > > > >> Thanks Francis > >> > >> Keith > >> > >> F Campos Costero wrote: > >>> Keith > >>> I hope I can start to review the documents before the end of next > week. I > >>> have another thing I have to work on for a few more days. Once I'm > free, > >>> I'll pick an
Re: Review of first 3 chapters of Writer Guide
Francis; Ideally You should go through the changes one, by one anseither accept them or reject them. However, there is a bug that makes that difficult if there are more than 4 or 5 changes. I will try to track that bug down and raise its priority to hopefully get it fixed. I see no reason given the known bug of accepting the changes and then making any new changes as necessary. Regards Keith F Campos Costero wrote: I finished my review of the first three chapters of the Writer Guide. After I pushed the commits, it occurred to me that I probably should have accepted all of Keith's edits that were in place when I fetched the documents. Does anyone object to a standard process of accepting all previous Tracked Changes and making new commits only with new edits or revisions of the previous ones? I have found that having a large number of tracked changes makes documents unwieldy and even unstable. Regards, Francis On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 6:09 PM F Campos Costero wrote: Keith, Sorry, I got myself confused. I incorporated Czeslaw's changes into the Getting Started Guide chapters 2 and 3 and did another pass through those chapters. I am just starting the review of the Writer guide. My comments above about folder structure apply to the Getting Started Guide but they will apply to the Writer Guide soon. Francis On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 12:38 PM F Campos Costero wrote: Keith, I just assigned the reviews of chapters 2 and 3 to myself. These are both done, actually, as I worked on them over the weekend. I took the version of the two chapters from the ForWiki folder, edited them (Czeslaw's changes plus a few minor changes of my own) and saved them in the Review folder. This was all done on my local computer. The local Review folder now contains my new versions of chapters 2 and 3 plus the previously existing review versions of all the other chapters. How do you want to handle those older "review" versions? Should I delete them, since they are, I suppose, superseded by the files in the ForWiki folder? There are also copies of all the chapters in the folder one level up from the ForWiki and Review folders. They seem to be, at the moment, duplicates of the versions in ForWiki. Do we need those? I would think that we need, at most, two copies of the files, one representing what is on the wiki and another that is the working copy. We could just have a single visible version and just be diligent about tagging the versions that get posted to the wiki, but I'm fine with whatever people are comfortable with. Three copies, though, seems like more than is necessary. Regards, Francis On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 10:47 AM Keith N. McKenna < keith.mcke...@comcast.net> wrote: Francis; I had a conversation with infra today as I was not able to assign you either. What you have to do is go ti http://gitbox.apache.org/ and link your ASF id there. Than you should be able to assign yourself, or I can assign you. In issues only committers or those with the triage privilege can be assigned to issues. Please let me know how it works out. Regards Keith F Campos Costero wrote: Hi Keith, I was going to assign myself to issue 95, the review of chapter 2, but I do not see any way to do that. Do I need to be granted some authority or am I not seeing something obvious? My github user id is FJCC. Francis On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 1:06 PM Keith N. McKenna < keith.mcke...@comcast.net> wrote: Thanks Francis Keith F Campos Costero wrote: Keith I hope I can start to review the documents before the end of next week. I have another thing I have to work on for a few more days. Once I'm free, I'll pick an issue. Francis On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 1:32 PM Keith N. McKenna < keith.mcke...@comcast.net> wrote: A second review of Chapters 1-3 of the Writer Guide are needed. Please Assign yourself to the GitHub issues and review. Francis if you cannot assign yourself, let me know which you will do and gn you.and I will assi Thanks Keith - To unsubscribe, e-mail: doc-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: doc-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: doc-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: doc-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: doc-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: doc-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: doc-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: doc-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Review of first 3 chapters of Writer Guide
Francis; Sorry it has taken so long to get back to you. I have been ill. I understand getting yourself confused, I do it to myself all the time.I will look forward to seeing your commits for the changes. Regards Keith F Campos Costero wrote: Keith Sorry, I got myself confused. I incorporated Czeslaw's changes into the Getting Started Guide chapters 2 and 3 and did another pass through those chapters. I am just starting the review of the Writer guide. My comments above about folder structure apply to the Getting Started Guide but they will apply to the Writer Guide soon. Francis On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 12:38 PM F Campos Costero wrote: Keith, I just assigned the reviews of chapters 2 and 3 to myself. These are both done, actually, as I worked on them over the weekend. I took the version of the two chapters from the ForWiki folder, edited them (Czeslaw's changes plus a few minor changes of my own) and saved them in the Review folder. This was all done on my local computer. The local Review folder now contains my new versions of chapters 2 and 3 plus the previously existing review versions of all the other chapters. How do you want to handle those older "review" versions? Should I delete them, since they are, I suppose, superseded by the files in the ForWiki folder? There are also copies of all the chapters in the folder one level up from the ForWiki and Review folders. They seem to be, at the moment, duplicates of the versions in ForWiki. Do we need those? I would think that we need, at most, two copies of the files, one representing what is on the wiki and another that is the working copy. We could just have a single visible version and just be diligent about tagging the versions that get posted to the wiki, but I'm fine with whatever people are comfortable with. Three copies, though, seems like more than is necessary. Regards, Francis On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 10:47 AM Keith N. McKenna < keith.mcke...@comcast.net> wrote: Francis; I had a conversation with infra today as I was not able to assign you either. What you have to do is go ti http://gitbox.apache.org/ and link your ASF id there. Than you should be able to assign yourself, or I can assign you. In issues only committers or those with the triage privilege can be assigned to issues. Please let me know how it works out. Regards Keith F Campos Costero wrote: Hi Keith, I was going to assign myself to issue 95, the review of chapter 2, but I do not see any way to do that. Do I need to be granted some authority or am I not seeing something obvious? My github user id is FJCC. Francis On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 1:06 PM Keith N. McKenna < keith.mcke...@comcast.net> wrote: Thanks Francis Keith F Campos Costero wrote: Keith I hope I can start to review the documents before the end of next week. I have another thing I have to work on for a few more days. Once I'm free, I'll pick an issue. Francis On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 1:32 PM Keith N. McKenna < keith.mcke...@comcast.net> wrote: A second review of Chapters 1-3 of the Writer Guide are needed. Please Assign yourself to the GitHub issues and review. Francis if you cannot assign yourself, let me know which you will do and gn you.and I will assi Thanks Keith - To unsubscribe, e-mail: doc-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: doc-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: doc-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: doc-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: doc-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: doc-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: doc-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: doc-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Review of first 3 chapters of Writer Guide
I finished my review of the first three chapters of the Writer Guide. After I pushed the commits, it occurred to me that I probably should have accepted all of Keith's edits that were in place when I fetched the documents. Does anyone object to a standard process of accepting all previous Tracked Changes and making new commits only with new edits or revisions of the previous ones? I have found that having a large number of tracked changes makes documents unwieldy and even unstable. Regards, Francis On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 6:09 PM F Campos Costero wrote: > Keith, > Sorry, I got myself confused. I incorporated Czeslaw's changes into the > Getting Started Guide chapters 2 and 3 and did another pass through those > chapters. I am just starting the review of the Writer guide. My comments > above about folder structure apply to the Getting Started Guide but they > will apply to the Writer Guide soon. > > Francis > > On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 12:38 PM F Campos Costero > wrote: > >> Keith, >> I just assigned the reviews of chapters 2 and 3 to myself. These are both >> done, actually, as I worked on them over the weekend. I took the version of >> the two chapters from the ForWiki folder, edited them (Czeslaw's changes >> plus a few minor changes of my own) and saved them in the Review folder. >> This was all done on my local computer. The local Review folder now >> contains my new versions of chapters 2 and 3 plus the previously existing >> review versions of all the other chapters. How do you want to handle those >> older "review" versions? Should I delete them, since they are, I suppose, >> superseded by the files in the ForWiki folder? >> There are also copies of all the chapters in the folder one level up from >> the ForWiki and Review folders. They seem to be, at the moment, duplicates >> of the versions in ForWiki. Do we need those? I would think that we need, >> at most, two copies of the files, one representing what is on the wiki and >> another that is the working copy. We could just have a single visible >> version and just be diligent about tagging the versions that get posted to >> the wiki, but I'm fine with whatever people are comfortable with. Three >> copies, though, seems like more than is necessary. >> Regards, >> Francis >> >> On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 10:47 AM Keith N. McKenna < >> keith.mcke...@comcast.net> wrote: >> >>> Francis; >>> >>> I had a conversation with infra today as I was not able to assign you >>> either. What you have to do is go ti http://gitbox.apache.org/ and link >>> your ASF id there. Than you should be able to assign yourself, or I can >>> assign you. In issues only committers or those with the triage privilege >>> can be assigned to issues. >>> >>> Please let me know how it works out. >>> >>> Regards >>> Keith >>> >>> >>> F Campos Costero wrote: >>> > Hi Keith, >>> > I was going to assign myself to issue 95, the review of chapter 2, but >>> I do >>> > not see any way to do that. Do I need to be granted some authority or >>> am I >>> > not seeing something obvious? My github user id is FJCC. >>> > >>> > Francis >>> > >>> > >>> > On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 1:06 PM Keith N. McKenna < >>> keith.mcke...@comcast.net> >>> > wrote: >>> > >>> >> Thanks Francis >>> >> >>> >> Keith >>> >> >>> >> F Campos Costero wrote: >>> >>> Keith >>> >>> I hope I can start to review the documents before the end of next >>> week. I >>> >>> have another thing I have to work on for a few more days. Once I'm >>> free, >>> >>> I'll pick an issue. >>> >>> Francis >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 1:32 PM Keith N. McKenna < >>> >> keith.mcke...@comcast.net> >>> >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> A second review of Chapters 1-3 of the Writer Guide are needed. >>> Please >>> Assign yourself to the GitHub issues and review. >>> >>> Francis if you cannot assign yourself, let me know which you will >>> do and >>> gn you.and I will assi >>> >>> Thanks >>> Keith >>> >>> >>> >>> - >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: doc-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: doc-h...@openoffice.apache.org >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> - >>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: doc-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: doc-h...@openoffice.apache.org >>> >> >>> >> >>> > >>> >>> >>> >>> - >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: doc-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: doc-h...@openoffice.apache.org >>> >>>
Re: Review of first 3 chapters of Writer Guide
Keith, Sorry, I got myself confused. I incorporated Czeslaw's changes into the Getting Started Guide chapters 2 and 3 and did another pass through those chapters. I am just starting the review of the Writer guide. My comments above about folder structure apply to the Getting Started Guide but they will apply to the Writer Guide soon. Francis On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 12:38 PM F Campos Costero wrote: > Keith, > I just assigned the reviews of chapters 2 and 3 to myself. These are both > done, actually, as I worked on them over the weekend. I took the version of > the two chapters from the ForWiki folder, edited them (Czeslaw's changes > plus a few minor changes of my own) and saved them in the Review folder. > This was all done on my local computer. The local Review folder now > contains my new versions of chapters 2 and 3 plus the previously existing > review versions of all the other chapters. How do you want to handle those > older "review" versions? Should I delete them, since they are, I suppose, > superseded by the files in the ForWiki folder? > There are also copies of all the chapters in the folder one level up from > the ForWiki and Review folders. They seem to be, at the moment, duplicates > of the versions in ForWiki. Do we need those? I would think that we need, > at most, two copies of the files, one representing what is on the wiki and > another that is the working copy. We could just have a single visible > version and just be diligent about tagging the versions that get posted to > the wiki, but I'm fine with whatever people are comfortable with. Three > copies, though, seems like more than is necessary. > Regards, > Francis > > On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 10:47 AM Keith N. McKenna < > keith.mcke...@comcast.net> wrote: > >> Francis; >> >> I had a conversation with infra today as I was not able to assign you >> either. What you have to do is go ti http://gitbox.apache.org/ and link >> your ASF id there. Than you should be able to assign yourself, or I can >> assign you. In issues only committers or those with the triage privilege >> can be assigned to issues. >> >> Please let me know how it works out. >> >> Regards >> Keith >> >> >> F Campos Costero wrote: >> > Hi Keith, >> > I was going to assign myself to issue 95, the review of chapter 2, but >> I do >> > not see any way to do that. Do I need to be granted some authority or >> am I >> > not seeing something obvious? My github user id is FJCC. >> > >> > Francis >> > >> > >> > On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 1:06 PM Keith N. McKenna < >> keith.mcke...@comcast.net> >> > wrote: >> > >> >> Thanks Francis >> >> >> >> Keith >> >> >> >> F Campos Costero wrote: >> >>> Keith >> >>> I hope I can start to review the documents before the end of next >> week. I >> >>> have another thing I have to work on for a few more days. Once I'm >> free, >> >>> I'll pick an issue. >> >>> Francis >> >>> >> >>> On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 1:32 PM Keith N. McKenna < >> >> keith.mcke...@comcast.net> >> >>> wrote: >> >>> >> A second review of Chapters 1-3 of the Writer Guide are needed. >> Please >> Assign yourself to the GitHub issues and review. >> >> Francis if you cannot assign yourself, let me know which you will do >> and >> gn you.and I will assi >> >> Thanks >> Keith >> >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: doc-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: doc-h...@openoffice.apache.org >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> - >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: doc-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: doc-h...@openoffice.apache.org >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: doc-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: doc-h...@openoffice.apache.org >> >>
Re: Review of first 3 chapters of Writer Guide
Keith, I just assigned the reviews of chapters 2 and 3 to myself. These are both done, actually, as I worked on them over the weekend. I took the version of the two chapters from the ForWiki folder, edited them (Czeslaw's changes plus a few minor changes of my own) and saved them in the Review folder. This was all done on my local computer. The local Review folder now contains my new versions of chapters 2 and 3 plus the previously existing review versions of all the other chapters. How do you want to handle those older "review" versions? Should I delete them, since they are, I suppose, superseded by the files in the ForWiki folder? There are also copies of all the chapters in the folder one level up from the ForWiki and Review folders. They seem to be, at the moment, duplicates of the versions in ForWiki. Do we need those? I would think that we need, at most, two copies of the files, one representing what is on the wiki and another that is the working copy. We could just have a single visible version and just be diligent about tagging the versions that get posted to the wiki, but I'm fine with whatever people are comfortable with. Three copies, though, seems like more than is necessary. Regards, Francis On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 10:47 AM Keith N. McKenna wrote: > Francis; > > I had a conversation with infra today as I was not able to assign you > either. What you have to do is go ti http://gitbox.apache.org/ and link > your ASF id there. Than you should be able to assign yourself, or I can > assign you. In issues only committers or those with the triage privilege > can be assigned to issues. > > Please let me know how it works out. > > Regards > Keith > > > F Campos Costero wrote: > > Hi Keith, > > I was going to assign myself to issue 95, the review of chapter 2, but I > do > > not see any way to do that. Do I need to be granted some authority or am > I > > not seeing something obvious? My github user id is FJCC. > > > > Francis > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 1:06 PM Keith N. McKenna < > keith.mcke...@comcast.net> > > wrote: > > > >> Thanks Francis > >> > >> Keith > >> > >> F Campos Costero wrote: > >>> Keith > >>> I hope I can start to review the documents before the end of next > week. I > >>> have another thing I have to work on for a few more days. Once I'm > free, > >>> I'll pick an issue. > >>> Francis > >>> > >>> On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 1:32 PM Keith N. McKenna < > >> keith.mcke...@comcast.net> > >>> wrote: > >>> > A second review of Chapters 1-3 of the Writer Guide are needed. Please > Assign yourself to the GitHub issues and review. > > Francis if you cannot assign yourself, let me know which you will do > and > gn you.and I will assi > > Thanks > Keith > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: doc-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: doc-h...@openoffice.apache.org > > > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> - > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: doc-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > >> For additional commands, e-mail: doc-h...@openoffice.apache.org > >> > >> > > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: doc-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: doc-h...@openoffice.apache.org > >
Re: Review of first 3 chapters of Writer Guide
Francis; I had a conversation with infra today as I was not able to assign you either. What you have to do is go ti http://gitbox.apache.org/ and link your ASF id there. Than you should be able to assign yourself, or I can assign you. In issues only committers or those with the triage privilege can be assigned to issues. Please let me know how it works out. Regards Keith F Campos Costero wrote: Hi Keith, I was going to assign myself to issue 95, the review of chapter 2, but I do not see any way to do that. Do I need to be granted some authority or am I not seeing something obvious? My github user id is FJCC. Francis On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 1:06 PM Keith N. McKenna wrote: Thanks Francis Keith F Campos Costero wrote: Keith I hope I can start to review the documents before the end of next week. I have another thing I have to work on for a few more days. Once I'm free, I'll pick an issue. Francis On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 1:32 PM Keith N. McKenna < keith.mcke...@comcast.net> wrote: A second review of Chapters 1-3 of the Writer Guide are needed. Please Assign yourself to the GitHub issues and review. Francis if you cannot assign yourself, let me know which you will do and gn you.and I will assi Thanks Keith - To unsubscribe, e-mail: doc-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: doc-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: doc-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: doc-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: doc-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: doc-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Review of first 3 chapters of Writer Guide
F Campos Costero wrote: Hi Keith, I was going to assign myself to issue 95, the review of chapter 2, but I do not see any way to do that. Do I need to be granted some authority or am I not seeing something obvious? My github user id is FJCC. Francis Francis; The problem is that your FJCC id and your committer id are different. I believe that you need to link your committer id to to GitHub. I will check with Infra tomorrow to see the esiest way to do that. Meanwhile I will assign you to the issue now. Regards Keith On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 1:06 PM Keith N. McKenna wrote: Thanks Francis Keith F Campos Costero wrote: Keith I hope I can start to review the documents before the end of next week. I have another thing I have to work on for a few more days. Once I'm free, I'll pick an issue. Francis On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 1:32 PM Keith N. McKenna < keith.mcke...@comcast.net> wrote: A second review of Chapters 1-3 of the Writer Guide are needed. Please Assign yourself to the GitHub issues and review. Francis if you cannot assign yourself, let me know which you will do and gn you.and I will assi Thanks Keith - To unsubscribe, e-mail: doc-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: doc-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: doc-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: doc-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: doc-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: doc-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Review of first 3 chapters of Writer Guide
Hi Keith, I was going to assign myself to issue 95, the review of chapter 2, but I do not see any way to do that. Do I need to be granted some authority or am I not seeing something obvious? My github user id is FJCC. Francis On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 1:06 PM Keith N. McKenna wrote: > Thanks Francis > > Keith > > F Campos Costero wrote: > > Keith > > I hope I can start to review the documents before the end of next week. I > > have another thing I have to work on for a few more days. Once I'm free, > > I'll pick an issue. > > Francis > > > > On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 1:32 PM Keith N. McKenna < > keith.mcke...@comcast.net> > > wrote: > > > >> A second review of Chapters 1-3 of the Writer Guide are needed. Please > >> Assign yourself to the GitHub issues and review. > >> > >> Francis if you cannot assign yourself, let me know which you will do and > >> gn you.and I will assi > >> > >> Thanks > >> Keith > >> > >> > >> - > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: doc-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > >> For additional commands, e-mail: doc-h...@openoffice.apache.org > >> > >> > > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: doc-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: doc-h...@openoffice.apache.org > >
Re: Review of first 3 chapters of Writer Guide
Thanks Francis Keith F Campos Costero wrote: Keith I hope I can start to review the documents before the end of next week. I have another thing I have to work on for a few more days. Once I'm free, I'll pick an issue. Francis On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 1:32 PM Keith N. McKenna wrote: A second review of Chapters 1-3 of the Writer Guide are needed. Please Assign yourself to the GitHub issues and review. Francis if you cannot assign yourself, let me know which you will do and gn you.and I will assi Thanks Keith - To unsubscribe, e-mail: doc-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: doc-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: doc-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: doc-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Review of first 3 chapters of Writer Guide
Keith I hope I can start to review the documents before the end of next week. I have another thing I have to work on for a few more days. Once I'm free, I'll pick an issue. Francis On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 1:32 PM Keith N. McKenna wrote: > A second review of Chapters 1-3 of the Writer Guide are needed. Please > Assign yourself to the GitHub issues and review. > > Francis if you cannot assign yourself, let me know which you will do and > gn you.and I will assi > > Thanks > Keith > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: doc-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: doc-h...@openoffice.apache.org > >
